“…Under risk of sperm competition, males might trade-off resources between traits that reduce sperm competition (e.g., increased mate guarding) versus traits that increase fertilization success (e.g., increased sperm quality, Kelly & Jennions, 2011;Schradin, Eder, & Müller, 2012). Such statusdependent investment, where non-mate-guarding floater, satellite, or sneaker males exhibit better sperm performance than dominant mateguarding males, has been observed in captive and wild vertebrates (Fasel et al, 2016;Fitzpatrick, Desjardins, Milligan, Montgomerie, & Balshine, 2007;Froman, Pizzari, Feltmann, Castillo-Juarez, & Birkhead, 2002;Neff, Fu, & Gross, 2003;Stockley, Searle, Macdonald, & Jones, 1994). Therefore, effects of individual social status should also be estimated when quantifying sperm performance in systems with statedependent plasticity in tactics.…”