Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data 1985
DOI: 10.1017/ccol0521304539.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
410
0
7

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 775 publications
(419 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
410
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Page 5 Rubin, 1983) or Ignorable Treatment Assignment Assumption (Heckman and Robb, 1985;Holland, 1986)), 2…”
Section: Hsiao Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Page 5 Rubin, 1983) or Ignorable Treatment Assignment Assumption (Heckman and Robb, 1985;Holland, 1986)), 2…”
Section: Hsiao Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…see the survey of Friedlander et al (1997)). The measurements may be subject to various selection bias (e.g., Angrist et al (1996), Heckman and Robb (1985), and Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983)). With panel data outcomes of the same individual before and after the treatment could be observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 There are different restrictions (e.g. Angrist and Imbens, 1991, Imbens and Angrist, 1994, Heckman and Hotz, 1989, Heckman and Robb, 1985 available to solve the identification problem, but this one appears to be the most fundamental in its close resemblance of the experimental context, and, given the data available and the nature of the objective pursued here, it is best suited for this context.…”
Section: Causality Potential Outcomes Identification and Balancingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various model-based procedures are suggested in the econometrics' literature to avoid such biases (see for example Hotz, 1989, or Heckman andRobb, 1985). 2 However, Ashenfelter and Card (1985) and LaLonde (1986) -among others -conclude that the results are highly sensitive to the different stochastic assumptions made about the selection process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already noted by Heckman and Robb (1985) and Ahn and Powell (1993) in single-index selection models the selectivity bias can be expressed as the probability of selection given covariates.…”
Section: Schooling Probabilities As Su Cient Statistics In Single Andmentioning
confidence: 91%