2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0033822200046440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative Methods for Cellulose Preparation for AMS Measurement

Abstract: ABSTRACT.The main methods applied to clean plant material for radiocarbon dating are not compound-specific and generally remove only the easily exchangeable components by an acid-base-acid sequence and additional optional steps like Soxhlet extraction to remove resins and oxidative bleaching with NaClO 2 . The products are normally clean enough for standard 14 C measurement, but in some cases it is desirable to have pure cellulose, which remains unchanged and immobile over longer time ranges, better representi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
92
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 78 samples from these 10 cores were submitted for 14 C dating to satisfy the requirements for optimizing the calendar chronologies of the cores. 14 C measurements in these samples were performed on alpha-cellulose extracted from wood (Nemec et al 2010). Results (Table 2) revealed post-bomb 14 C concentrations (Hua and Barbetti 2004;Levin et al 2010) in the outer parts of the tree trunks, while the inner parts almost exclusively yielded 14 C dates between ~100 and 200 14 C BP, in agreement with the range of the wiggly part of the 14 C calibration curve between AD 1650 and 1950 (Reimer et al 2009).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…A total of 78 samples from these 10 cores were submitted for 14 C dating to satisfy the requirements for optimizing the calendar chronologies of the cores. 14 C measurements in these samples were performed on alpha-cellulose extracted from wood (Nemec et al 2010). Results (Table 2) revealed post-bomb 14 C concentrations (Hua and Barbetti 2004;Levin et al 2010) in the outer parts of the tree trunks, while the inner parts almost exclusively yielded 14 C dates between ~100 and 200 14 C BP, in agreement with the range of the wiggly part of the 14 C calibration curve between AD 1650 and 1950 (Reimer et al 2009).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The wood samples for high-precision measurements as shown below were cleaned with a base-acidbase-acid bleaching procedure (NÏmec et al 2010) and then graphitized on a recently developed system that is fully automated (Wacker et al 2010b). The graphitization system is directly coupled to an elemental analyzer (EA) and runs without any user interaction after the samples are loaded into the EA and the iron catalyst is inserted into individual reactors.…”
Section: Methods Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not know if the offset originates from systematic effects of our measurement procedures. Some of the wood samples presented were also treated with a simple acid-base-acid procedure for comparison and do not show the 26-yr offset (NÏmec et al 2010). The applied rigorous pretreatment with baseacid-base-acid-bleaching could therefore be responsible for the observed offset.…”
Section: Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It remained open whether the offset originates from a systematic error during 14 C measurement or if the base-acid-base-acid-bleaching (BABAB) method [7] can be responsible for the observed offset.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%