2016
DOI: 10.4152/pea.201604277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative Electrocoagulation for Livestock Wastewater Treatment

Abstract: This project assessed the technical feasibility of organic matter (COD) removal in livestock effluents, by electrocoagulation. An experimental design was used to block two factors at three levels, to evaluate the effect of the variables distance between electrodes and pH, using aluminum sacrificial electrodes. Maximum removal (90.16%) was obtained at 7 units pH, and 2.0 cm distance between electrodes. This study demonstrated the technical feasibility of electrocoagulation (EC) for the removal of organic matter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The CV data for treated Murray River water [A254, EC: 7.8%, CC: 0.9%; colour, EC: 17%, CC: Several factors have been linked to the EC efficiency in removing pollutants including the electrode material, EC process time, EC cell voltage, EC cell electric current, electrolyte concentration and type, pH, temperature, distances between electrodes, electrode shape, EC cell structure and configuration of electrode electrical connections. 21,26,[56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] In this study, the performance of the EC process for DOM removal (using an aluminium electrode, at the optimum pH and ambient temperature) was found to be related to the generated coagulant dose. This was also found to be similar to the comparative chemical coagulant dosing (CC) process.…”
Section: Comparison Of En-ec With Encmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The CV data for treated Murray River water [A254, EC: 7.8%, CC: 0.9%; colour, EC: 17%, CC: Several factors have been linked to the EC efficiency in removing pollutants including the electrode material, EC process time, EC cell voltage, EC cell electric current, electrolyte concentration and type, pH, temperature, distances between electrodes, electrode shape, EC cell structure and configuration of electrode electrical connections. 21,26,[56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] In this study, the performance of the EC process for DOM removal (using an aluminium electrode, at the optimum pH and ambient temperature) was found to be related to the generated coagulant dose. This was also found to be similar to the comparative chemical coagulant dosing (CC) process.…”
Section: Comparison Of En-ec With Encmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Interelectrode distance (cm) 1. COD removal (%) [ 160 ] Electrocoagulation BBD 17 1. Current density (mA cm −2 ) 2. pH 3.…”
Section: Application Of Rsm In Various Livestock Wastewater Treatment...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Además, estas aguas pueden alcanzar altas concentraciones de contaminantes, dependiendo de los procesos de operación y procesamiento de los alimentos (Pinedo, Paternina y Marrugo, 2015). El tratamiento de las aguas residuales industriales requiere la reducción de los niveles de contaminantes, porque presentan un alto riesgo para los recursos hídricos y el suelo, lo que puede contribuir con perjuicios si no son tratados apropiadamente antes de ser vertidos al ambiente (Reilly et al, 2019). No obstante, las altas concentraciones de sustancias en estas aguas requieren del uso de tecnologías avanzadas para reducir la carga contaminante, ya que su tratamiento puede tornarse altamente costoso, en especial por el uso necesario de energía eléctrica en los procesos (Bustillo-Lecompte y Mehrvar, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified