2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative Digit Ratios and Their Relationship to Prostate Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This explicitly indicates that the same mechanism is not mediating the effects of different variables (which may not be clear in a single‐digit ratio study). Thus, the present study adds support to the significance of multiple digit ratios study design (Kumar et al, 2017; Kumar, Singh, & Voracek, 2020; Loehlin et al, 2009; Stolten et al, 2016; Voracek, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This explicitly indicates that the same mechanism is not mediating the effects of different variables (which may not be clear in a single‐digit ratio study). Thus, the present study adds support to the significance of multiple digit ratios study design (Kumar et al, 2017; Kumar, Singh, & Voracek, 2020; Loehlin et al, 2009; Stolten et al, 2016; Voracek, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Therefore, the study of dorsal digit ratios may provide a better assessment of any likely difference in bone digit ratios. Moreover, ethnic differences have been found to occur across several digit ratios (Stolten et al, 2016) and a better criterion for the assessment of the ethnic differences may be the measurement of multiple characteristics (Ousley et al, 2009). Thus, in the present study, we studied the effects of caste and other variables on the multiple digit ratios (2D:4D and alternative digit ratios) on the palmar as well as on the dorsal sides of hands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of studies did not find an association of 2D : 4D ratio with Gleason score, metastatic status, and family history of prostate cancer [ 20 , 25 , 26 ] with the exception of one study that found inverse relationship of 2D : 4D ratio with core cancer volume and biopsy cores with high Gleason score in a study of 408 positive biopsy cores [ 21 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several lines of evidence suggest that the prenatal balance of sex hormones, reflected in the 2D:4D ratio, might have a multilateral long‐term effect on the human biological condition and might affect adult disease risk, especially with regard to hormone‐related diseases (Manning et al, ; Zheng & Cohn, ). In recent years, the 2D:4D ratio has received great attention from researchers who have found a relationship between 2D:4D ratio and certain cancers (Lu et al, ; Nicolas & Jorge, ; Nicolas et al, ; Stolten, Ledet, Dotiwala, Luk, & Sartor, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%