2006
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-24-1957-2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternating bursts of low energy ions and electrons near the substorm onset

Abstract: Abstract. The substorm associated behavior of the low energy particles (30 eV-28.5 keV) near the earthward edge of the plasma sheet is examined using data from CRRES during the late growth and early expansion phases of a substorm on 12 March 1991 and their significance for the substorm onset mechanism is discussed. In this substorm, the CRRES was located on L ∼6.3 and ∼20 • westward of the substorm onset and observed the sequence of the alternating bursts of the low energy ions and electrons. The bursts of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After 18:34 UT (moment “1”), we can observe the following: (i) the injection of fresh high‐energy ions (81 –157 keV) ( population “3”) occurs simultaneously with the sharp drop of pressure of the low‐energy (< 29 keV) ions and (ii) the anticorrelation of the high‐energy ions and electron fluxes appears. The last is usually observed during passage across the WTS and can be associated with the interchange instability [ Roux , ; Roux et al ., ; Kozelova et al ., , ]. The substorm onset is a source of these fresh westward drifting energetic ions, and it locates near and eastward of the THEMIS‐C.…”
Section: Observations During the Substorm On 6 January 2008mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…After 18:34 UT (moment “1”), we can observe the following: (i) the injection of fresh high‐energy ions (81 –157 keV) ( population “3”) occurs simultaneously with the sharp drop of pressure of the low‐energy (< 29 keV) ions and (ii) the anticorrelation of the high‐energy ions and electron fluxes appears. The last is usually observed during passage across the WTS and can be associated with the interchange instability [ Roux , ; Roux et al ., ; Kozelova et al ., , ]. The substorm onset is a source of these fresh westward drifting energetic ions, and it locates near and eastward of the THEMIS‐C.…”
Section: Observations During the Substorm On 6 January 2008mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new electron flux may be a signature of a coupling of the shear flow and KH instabilities. In the linear stage, this coupling may generate vortex‐like structures [ Voronkov et al ., , ] (see for details). The oscillations with a similar period of 40–65 s often appear during the growth phase near r = 6.6 R E before substorm onset [ Roux et al ., ; Holter et al ., ; Erickson et al ., ; Kozelova et al ., ]. The second state of plasma was observed after the moment “1” in the region of lower pressure of the low‐energy (< 29 keV) ions with the highly stretched magnetic field lines. The system jumps to this state at the nonlinear stage of development of the instability (ballooning, see for details) with growth timescale ~ 10 s. The sharp spatial boundary between the inner magnetosphere and the plasma sheet is formed during the substorm onset and delineates the transition from dipolar to taillike magnetic field configuration with an estimated magnetic field jump of ~ 8 nT. This region was observed when Ey was negative.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Field and Currents In The Magnetospherementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Occurrence of a storm, even a moderate one, can be not directly related to the occurrence of the surface charging. The electron flux at the keV energies is largely determined by convective (Korth et al 1999;Elkington et al 2004;Miyoshi et al 2006;Kurita et al 2011;) and substorm-associated (Vakulin et al 1988;Grafodatskiy et al 1987;Degtyarev et al 1990;Fok et al 2001a;Khazanov et al 2004;Kozelova et al 2006;Ganushkina et al 2013;Turner et al 2015) electric fields. Since it varies on short time scales, it is not possible to average the keV electron fluxes over an orbit/day/hour as it can be done for higher energies, like MeVs.…”
Section: Ring Current Electrons and Effects On Satellitesmentioning
confidence: 99%