The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered social cohesion and adverse psychological experiences with chronic food insecurity in the non-market economy and complex households of Burkina Faso

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
70
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be important in context of whether and how households and individuals make substitutions of less preferred foods in the face of constrained access, or access foods in socially acceptable ways, both of which could have implications for health (including mental health) outcomes. The newer, experience-based measures reflect the growing recognition that food itself is often heavy with meaning, and how foods are acquired, what foods are consumed, how they are consumed, when they are consumed and with whom they are consumed are important elements of one's experience of food security or insecurity (Hamelin et al, 2002;Weaver and Hadley, 2009;Nanama and Frongillo, 2011; for more on the health implications of failing to achieve one's cultural models, see Dressler, 2005). Experience-based measures of food insecurity are, of course, not without their problems, chief among these are, first, the degree to which food insecurity can be captured by a single set of questions and, second, the extent to which similar scales work in comparable ways in different contexts.…”
Section: Measurement Of Food Insecuritymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could be important in context of whether and how households and individuals make substitutions of less preferred foods in the face of constrained access, or access foods in socially acceptable ways, both of which could have implications for health (including mental health) outcomes. The newer, experience-based measures reflect the growing recognition that food itself is often heavy with meaning, and how foods are acquired, what foods are consumed, how they are consumed, when they are consumed and with whom they are consumed are important elements of one's experience of food security or insecurity (Hamelin et al, 2002;Weaver and Hadley, 2009;Nanama and Frongillo, 2011; for more on the health implications of failing to achieve one's cultural models, see Dressler, 2005). Experience-based measures of food insecurity are, of course, not without their problems, chief among these are, first, the degree to which food insecurity can be captured by a single set of questions and, second, the extent to which similar scales work in comparable ways in different contexts.…”
Section: Measurement Of Food Insecuritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, because of the social value attached to food and commensal eating, coping with food insecurity may generate feelings of shame, isolation, and anxiety and low mood (Hamelin et al, 2002;Weaver and Hadley, 2009;Nanama and Frongillo, 2011); these may in turn impact on health behaviors with implications for individual wellbeing. Future work on food insecurity and health outcomes would benefit immensely from a strong foundation in the ethnography of coping in a particular setting, and then using that information to generate directional hypotheses about how coping might impact on health outcomes.…”
Section: Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children experience cognitive, emotional, and phys-ical awareness of FI, participate in parental management strategies, and initiate their own strategies to manage FI and generate resources (19). Second, not all individuals in a household may have the same experience of FI, depending on the intra-household allocation of resources and possibly other factors (9,20,21). FI reported at the household level exceeded that reported by adolescents at the individual level in Ethiopia (22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a large proportion of respondents stack on the Bfood secure^end, the scale may be unable to differentiate between food secure households and those with mild food insecurity. Respondents may also underreport experiences of food insecurity in sensitive socio-cultural contexts (Nanama and Frongillo 2012) and/or under well-adapted chronic food deprivation (i.e., they no longer perceive the problem) (Na et al 2015). Researchers should bear in mind the subjective nature of perceptionbased scales and be aware of potential bias when using them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%