2018
DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered perception‐action binding modulates inhibitory control in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome

Abstract: Stimulus-action inhibition binding is stronger in GTS patients than healthy controls and affects inhibitory control corroborating the concept suggesting that GTS might be a condition of altered perception-action integration (binding); i.e. a disorder of purposeful actions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
51
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…No difference was evident in the NoGo incompatible condition and the NoGo compatible condition (all t < 1.01; p > 0.3). This is completely in line with the previous results by Petruo et al (2018) and cross-validates these results. At time point T2, the ANOVA revealed a main effect "condition" (F(2,40) = 53.40; p < 0.001; η p 2 = 0.572), showing that the FAs were, again, highest in the NoGo without condition (24.28 ± 3.1), followed by the NoGo incompatible condition (16.81 ± 1.8) and the NoGo compatible condition (6.66 ± 1.2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No difference was evident in the NoGo incompatible condition and the NoGo compatible condition (all t < 1.01; p > 0.3). This is completely in line with the previous results by Petruo et al (2018) and cross-validates these results. At time point T2, the ANOVA revealed a main effect "condition" (F(2,40) = 53.40; p < 0.001; η p 2 = 0.572), showing that the FAs were, again, highest in the NoGo without condition (24.28 ± 3.1), followed by the NoGo incompatible condition (16.81 ± 1.8) and the NoGo compatible condition (6.66 ± 1.2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…GtS patients and healthy controls. This is a follow-up study of Petruo et al (2018) testing patients with GTS diagnosed according to DSM-IV using an auditory-visual Go/NoGo task. For the follow-up, a subsample of N = 21 GTS out of N = 35 previously studied patients between 9 to 19 years was available (mean age 13.09 ± 2.1; mean IQ = 107.13 ± 10.5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The source localization using sLORETA suggests that regions in superior frontal gyrus (BA6), the medial frontal cortex (BA24), anterior cingulate cortex (BA24) and the inferior parietal cortex (BA40) were modulated by interactive effects between “feature overlap × response” for the P3 and the C‐cluster. These regions have previously been suggested to be involved in event coding processes (Chmielewski & Beste, ; Chmielewski & Beste, ; Chmielewski & Beste, ; Elsner et al, ; Kühn et al, ; Petruo et al, ; Petruo et al, ; Zmigrod et al, ). However, the source localization findings were most consistent for the inferior parietal cortex (BA40), since this area was seen both in the sLORETA using the C‐cluster data and the nondecomposed P3 ERP data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In letzter Zeit rückt ein weiterer Kortexabschnitt, der rechte inferiore parietale Kortex (BA 40], in den Fokus. Dieser ist entscheidend an der Kopplung zwischen Wahrnehmungen und Aktionen (perception-action-binding) beteiligt [43], die bei GTS-Patienten gestört zu sein scheint [44].…”
Section: Kortikale Arealeunclassified
“…Wichtig ist, dass vorausgehende Bindungen darauffolgende Aktionen beeinflussen können. Wenn ein bekannter Stimulus eine neue Aktion auslösen soll, bereiten bereits etablierte Verbindungen ("event files") Probleme [43,88,89]. Genauer bedeutet dies, dass bei nur teilweiser Wiederholung der Eigenschaften eines "event files" schlechtere Ergebnisse erzielt werden als bei Wiederholung aller Eigenschaften oder wenn alle Eigenschaften unbekannt sind ("partial-repetition costs") [90].…”
Section: Perzeption Handlungunclassified