Altered muscle recruitment during extension from trunk flexion in low back pain developers

Nelson-Wong, Erika; Alex, Brendan; Csepe, David; Lancaster, Denver; Callaghan, Jack P.

doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.07.007

Cited by 61 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…1,2 Prior studies using the standing paradigm have resulted in reports of symptoms in 40–71% of back-healthy people 3–11 which has allowed identification of baseline differences between PDs and NPDs. However, none of the prior studies have considered whether the symptoms induced during the standing paradigm are similar to symptoms experienced by people with LBP.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Compared to NPDs, PDs have displayed (1) difficulty controlling the trunk during the clinical test of active hip abduction, 6 (2) more trunk extensor muscle activity in response to a trunk perturbation, 4 and (3) altered timing of activation of the trunk extensor muscles during the clinical test of return from forward bending. 11 Identification of baseline differences between PDs and NPDs can lend insight into the characteristics that may make a back-healthy person more susceptible to developing LBP symptoms during standing.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validity of a Paradigm for Low Back Pain Symptom Development During Prolonged Standing

Sorensen

Johnson²,

Callaghan

et al. 2015

The Clinical Journal of Pain

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Examine the validity of an induced pain paradigm in which people stand while performing simulated light work tasks (standing paradigm). Methods Initially, people with LBP reported the quality and location of their typical symptoms on a body pain diagram. Then, people with LBP and back-healthy people stood for 2 hours and reported the intensity, quality, and location of symptoms at baseline and every 15 minutes. Quality and location of typical symptoms of people with LBP were compared to their symptoms during standing. Back-healthy people were separated into pain developers (PDs) and non-pain developers. Symptom quality and location were compared between people with LBP and PDs. Results There were no differences in the quality and location of typical symptoms and symptoms during standing in people with LBP (P-values > 0.05). Three symptom descriptors were used by more than 30% of people with LBP to describe typical symptoms. Only 2 people with LBP used these descriptors to describe typical symptoms but not during standing. There were no differences in the quality and location of symptoms reported in standing between people with LBP and PDs (P-values > 0.05). Four symptom descriptors were used by more than 30% of participants with LBP during standing. There were no symptoms reported by PDs that were not reported by people with LBP. Discussion This study provides evidence that symptoms experienced during the standing paradigm are similar to symptoms experienced by people with LBP and, thus, provides support for the validity of the paradigm.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity of a Paradigm for Low Back Pain Symptom Development During Prolonged Standing

Sorensen

Johnson²,

Callaghan

et al. 2015

The Clinical Journal of Pain

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Based on existing reports of pain development in previously asymptomatic individuals during prolonged standing (Gregory and Callaghan (2008);Nelson-Wong et al (2012)) and prolonged sitting (Nairn et al (2013a)) it was expected that participants would naturally split into pain developing (PD) and non-pain developing (NPD) groups over the course of the two hours, and that differences in motion and EMG patterns would emerge between these groups.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transient pain developers show increased abdominal muscle activity during prolonged sitting

Nairn

Azar

Drake

2013

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Амплитуда движений поясничных сегментов, смежных с зоной спондилодеза, у пациентов с поясничным остеохондрозом при сгибании (а) и разгибании (б) позвоночника нение двигательной стратегии может быть связано с изменением коактива-ции мышц-антагонистов (сгибателей и разгибателей туловища) [21] либо с изменением последовательности активации синергистов -грудной и поясничной части мышцы-выпря-мителя спины, квадратной мышцы поясницы [30,39].…”

Section: рисunclassified

Кинематика Поясничных Сегментов, Смежных С Инструментальным Ригидным Заднебоковым Спондилодезом

Радченко¹,

Kolesnichenko²,

Конг³

et al. 2014

Хирургия позвоночника 3-2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Altered muscle recruitment during extension from trunk flexion in low back pain developers

Cited by 61 publications

References 23 publications

Validity of a Paradigm for Low Back Pain Symptom Development During Prolonged Standing

Validity of a Paradigm for Low Back Pain Symptom Development During Prolonged Standing

Transient pain developers show increased abdominal muscle activity during prolonged sitting

Кинематика Поясничных Сегментов, Смежных С Инструментальным Ригидным Заднебоковым Спондилодезом

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About