2015
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2015.00083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered Fetal Head Growth in Preeclampsia: A Retrospective Cohort Proof-Of-Concept Study

Abstract: BackgroundPreeclampsia is associated with fetal growth restriction and low birth weights. Neurotrophins, which mediate neuronal growth and development, are also increased in the placenta and cord blood in preeclampsia. Hence, the aim of this study was to determine whether fetal head growth is altered in preeclampsia, adjusting for growth restriction and other confounding variables.MethodsThis research included a retrospective cohort study, looking at fetal head circumference at birth, plus a case–control study… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Nepean cohort 1 , an initial power calculation revealed a sample of 100 subjects (50 cases with preeclampsia and 50 controls) to provide over 80% power to detect an effect size of 0.6 on thymus volume at the 5% level of significance. An effect of this magnitude represented a conservative interpretation of the results of our previous study 30 , which found a difference in thymus diameter corresponding to an effect size of 0.8 and obtained similar results using an approximated thymus volume based on the diameter measures. Intra-observer and inter-rater reliability were assessed used a Bland-Altman plot and a paired t -test for each assessment.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For Nepean cohort 1 , an initial power calculation revealed a sample of 100 subjects (50 cases with preeclampsia and 50 controls) to provide over 80% power to detect an effect size of 0.6 on thymus volume at the 5% level of significance. An effect of this magnitude represented a conservative interpretation of the results of our previous study 30 , which found a difference in thymus diameter corresponding to an effect size of 0.8 and obtained similar results using an approximated thymus volume based on the diameter measures. Intra-observer and inter-rater reliability were assessed used a Bland-Altman plot and a paired t -test for each assessment.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The estimated prevalence of preeclampsia at Nepean Hospital was based on our earlier retrospective study. The estimates of the standard deviation in thymus diameter measurements and the plausible odds ratio are also informed by the results of our previous retrospective study 30 . The effect of fetal thymus diameter on the odds of preeclampsia was evaluated in both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses (Model 1 and Model 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neonates with a preeclamptic mother were at twice the risk of having a large BBR, while the asymmetry measures indicated that this association was driven by neonates being at more than twice the risk of low birthweight asymmetry, with no association noted for HC asymmetry. Importantly, the latter findings are in line with earlier research indicating that preeclampsia associates with disproportionate reductions in fetal weight and length, while brain growth is preserved 23,24 …”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…There were no statistically significant differences in gestational age or neonatal head circumference between the PE and NP groups indicative of preservation of fetal brain blood flow and development of fetal head growth. 50 Placental weight of the PE group had positive correlations with gestational age, neonatal weight, neonatal length, and neonatal head circumference. These results indicate that placenta plays a crucial role in fetal growth and inadequate placentation is assumed to be important for the fetal development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%