2023
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered Callosal Morphology and Connectivity in Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Abstract: BackgroundCarotid stenosis, even in the clinically asymptomatic stage, causes cognitive impairment, silent lesions, and hemispheric changes. The corpus callosum (CC) is crucial for hemispheric cortical integration and specialization.PurposeTo examine if CC morphology and connectivity relate to cognitive decline and lesion burden in asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS).Study TypeRetrospective, cross‐sectional.Population33 patients with unilaterally severe (70%) ACS and 28 demographically and comorbidity‐matched … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
(91 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regional correspondingly, they found disruption in the functional connectivity of the default mode network and the frontoparietal network [10]. In addition, Liu et al identi ed signi cantly reduced connectivity in the transcallosal bers linking the orbitofrontal cortex, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and the temporoparieto-occipital regions compared with healthy controls [35]. In this study, we observed discrepancies in the integrity of these structures among CAS patients, which can account for the differences in their cognitive function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Regional correspondingly, they found disruption in the functional connectivity of the default mode network and the frontoparietal network [10]. In addition, Liu et al identi ed signi cantly reduced connectivity in the transcallosal bers linking the orbitofrontal cortex, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and the temporoparieto-occipital regions compared with healthy controls [35]. In this study, we observed discrepancies in the integrity of these structures among CAS patients, which can account for the differences in their cognitive function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%