2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.01.22.477319
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alteration of myocardial structure and function in RAF1-associated Noonan syndrome: Insights from cardiac disease modeling based on patient-derived iPSCs

Abstract: Noonan syndrome (NS), the most common among the RASopathies, is caused by germline variants in genes encoding components of the RAS-MAPK pathway. Distinct variants, including the recurrent Ser257Leu substitution in RAF1, are associated with severe hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Here, we investigated the elusive mechanistic link between NS-associated RAF1S257L and HCM using three-dimensional cardiac bodies and bioartificial cardiac tissues generated from patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, no myofibrillar disarray was observed in our cell model. However, the presence of myofibril disarray in NS remains controversial: whereas structural defects were described in RAF1 -associated iPSC models, 15,41 we and others did not observe any impact on sarcomere structures or myofibril organization in LZTR1 -related, PTPN11 -related, and BRAF -related iPSC-CMs, 10,14,16 implying potential genotype-dependent differences in the manifestation of myofibril disassembly in NS. Missense variants in LZTR1 located within the Kelch domain are predicted to affect substrate recognition, whereas missense variants in the BTB-BACK domain are assumed to impair either binding of cullin 3, proper homo-dimerization, or correct subcellular localization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, no myofibrillar disarray was observed in our cell model. However, the presence of myofibril disarray in NS remains controversial: whereas structural defects were described in RAF1 -associated iPSC models, 15,41 we and others did not observe any impact on sarcomere structures or myofibril organization in LZTR1 -related, PTPN11 -related, and BRAF -related iPSC-CMs, 10,14,16 implying potential genotype-dependent differences in the manifestation of myofibril disassembly in NS. Missense variants in LZTR1 located within the Kelch domain are predicted to affect substrate recognition, whereas missense variants in the BTB-BACK domain are assumed to impair either binding of cullin 3, proper homo-dimerization, or correct subcellular localization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Interestingly, no myofibrillar disarray was observed in our cell model. However, the presence of myofibril disarray in NS remains controversial: whereas structural defects were described in RAF1-associated iPSC models, 15,41 we and others did not observe any impact on sarcomere structures or myofibril organization in LZTR1-related, PTPN11-related, and BRAF-related iPSC-CMs, 10,14,16 implying potential genotype-dependent differences in the manifestation of myofibril disassembly in NS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This ultimately triggers stress signals released by different cell types of the microenvironment to compensate for the wall tension increase, resulting in a hypertrophic growth response [ 4 , 5 ]. Individual cardiomyocytes can increase in length and/or width in response to hypertrophic stimuli depending on the intracellular signaling cascades involved [ 6 , 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: General Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, both cardiac tissue from NS patients with CRAF and SHP2 variants, and iPSCs with SHP2-N308S variant, display cellular hyperplasia, rather than hypertrophy, which is presumably due to the increased cell cycle progression (Meier et al, 2021). However, hypertrophic phenotypes are observed in cardiomyocytes differentiated from NS-derived iPSCs with CRAF mutations (Jaffré et al, 2019;Nakhaei-Rad et al, 2022). The observed discrepancy may be related to the genetic background of the patients and/or the difference in the mutated gene itself: whereas NS-patients with a mutation in the CR2 domain of CRAF develop HCM in more than 90% of cases, this is the case for only 10% of NS-patients with PTPN11 mutations.…”
Section: Induced Pluripotent Stem Cellsmentioning
confidence: 97%