2018
DOI: 10.1149/2.0131805jss
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Almost Complete Removal of Ceria Particles Down to 10 nm Size from Silicon Dioxide Surfaces

Abstract: It has been very difficult to remove smaller ceria particles from silicon dioxide surfaces. One of the likely reasons is that the smaller ceria particles with a higher surface concentration of Ce 3+ are more strongly coupled with silicon dioxide surfaces via strong Ce-O-Si bonding. Here, we show that some equimolar solutions containing H 2 O 2 and either NH 4 OH or KOH, aided by ultrasonic cleaning, and at high pH can almost completely remove even 10 nm sized ceria particles from silicon dioxide film surfaces.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with Figure 4 a, the new presence of Si-C-O bond and Si-O bond suggest that the oxide layer formed on the Si-face surface after ultrasonic chemical corroding. The presence mechanism of Si-O bound can refer to the following Equations (2)–(5) [ 26 , 27 ]. The analysis results indicate that ultrasonic can contribute to driving the chemical corroding during CMP, which is due to the temperature rise and bubble movement, because when bubbles collapse in liquid, it results in an enormous concentration of energy from the conversion of the kinetic energy of liquid motion into heating of the contents of the bubble.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with Figure 4 a, the new presence of Si-C-O bond and Si-O bond suggest that the oxide layer formed on the Si-face surface after ultrasonic chemical corroding. The presence mechanism of Si-O bound can refer to the following Equations (2)–(5) [ 26 , 27 ]. The analysis results indicate that ultrasonic can contribute to driving the chemical corroding during CMP, which is due to the temperature rise and bubble movement, because when bubbles collapse in liquid, it results in an enormous concentration of energy from the conversion of the kinetic energy of liquid motion into heating of the contents of the bubble.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier, we demonstrated the ceria particles adsorbed on oxide surfaces via strong Ce-O-Si bond could not be removed effectively by only charge repulsion [5]. pH-adjusted DIW (pH 13.5) showed negligible cleaning efficiency (<5%) for 90 nm ceria particles, even when aided by ultrasonic cleaning [5]. In Figure 6: EW microscopy images of ceria particles adsorbed at (a) pH 3, (b) pH 5, (c) pH 7 and their removal using DIW adjusted to pH 10 and 12 as a function of number of washes.…”
Section: Removal Of Ceria Particles From a Glass Substrate As A Functmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ceria-based slurry has been widely used for STI CMP to uniformly polish the step height of SiO 2 , formed by the gap-filling process, and stop on an underlying Si 3 N 4 film [4][5][6]. Residual ceria abrasives are discovered after STI CMP process (Figure 2c) [21,33]. In contrast with a silica abrasive, ceria abrasive is more strongly coupled with the dielectric materials (in particular, SiO 2 film) via the formation of strong Ce-O-Si bonding [4,34].…”
Section: Residual Abrasive Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with a silica abrasive, ceria abrasive is more strongly coupled with the dielectric materials (in particular, SiO 2 film) via the formation of strong Ce-O-Si bonding [4,34]. It is well known that the surface Ce 3+ species are the active sites for the formation of strong Ce-O-Si bonds with SiO 2 films during polishing [4,21]. Various ceria abrasives such as smaller particles with higher surface Ce 3+ concentrations [35], the core/shell type Ce 3+ rich ceria [36], and metal-doping or coated ceria abrasive [37] have been investigated to improved SiO 2 removal rates, but making their removal during cleaning more difficult.…”
Section: Residual Abrasive Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation