2011
DOI: 10.1021/ic201083r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alloyed (ZnSe)x(CuInSe2)1–x and CuInSexS2–x Nanocrystals with a Monophase Zinc Blende Structure over the Entire Composition Range

Abstract: Metastable zinc blende CuInSe(2) nanocrystals were synthesized by a hot-injection approach. It was found that the lattice mismatches between zinc blende CuInSe(2) and ZnSe as well as CuInSe(2) and CuInS(2) are only 2.0% and 4.6%, respectively. Thus, alloyed (ZnSe)(x)(CuInSe(2))(1-x) and CuInSe(x)S(2-x) nanocrystals with a zinc blende structure have been successfully synthesized over the entire composition range, and the band gaps of alloys can be tuned in the range from 2.82 to 0.96 eV and 1.43 to 0.98 eV, res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(84 reference statements)
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The small variation of a VBM potential at lower x value than 0.5 is because of the relatively large bandgap bowing of (ZnSe) x (CIGS) 1-x material system. The results for both the lattice parameter and the VBM are similar to those reported for (ZnSe) x (CuInSe 2 ) 1-x by Li et al, and for (ZnS) x (CuGaS 2 ) 1-x by Quintans et al [36,37] It should be noted that the Mott-schottky plots revealed that the flat-band potential of (ZnSe) 0.89 (CIGS) 0.11 is about 0.2 V higher than that of CIGS indicating the about 0.2 V deeper VBM potential of (ZnSe) 0.89 (CIGS) 0.11 than that of CIGS. (see Figure S12 in the Supporting Information) The variation of the VBM potential between (ZnSe) 0.89 (CIGS) 0.11 and CIGS estimated by Mott-Schottky plots are consistent with PESA results.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The small variation of a VBM potential at lower x value than 0.5 is because of the relatively large bandgap bowing of (ZnSe) x (CIGS) 1-x material system. The results for both the lattice parameter and the VBM are similar to those reported for (ZnSe) x (CuInSe 2 ) 1-x by Li et al, and for (ZnS) x (CuGaS 2 ) 1-x by Quintans et al [36,37] It should be noted that the Mott-schottky plots revealed that the flat-band potential of (ZnSe) 0.89 (CIGS) 0.11 is about 0.2 V higher than that of CIGS indicating the about 0.2 V deeper VBM potential of (ZnSe) 0.89 (CIGS) 0.11 than that of CIGS. (see Figure S12 in the Supporting Information) The variation of the VBM potential between (ZnSe) 0.89 (CIGS) 0.11 and CIGS estimated by Mott-Schottky plots are consistent with PESA results.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Analysis of the PXRD pattern indicates a cubic-like crystal structure for the synthesized nanocrystals. 26 The measured peak locations for the 111, 220, and 311 planes are located between those of CuInS 2 and ZnS, as expected for the alloy material according to Vegard's law. 27 The interplanar spacings calculated from the XRD have been confirmed using the fast Fourier transform (FFT) diffractogram from the HRTEM image (see S.I.).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…The ZnSe shell may provide higher efficiencies than the ZnS shell since ZnSe has a relatively small, 2% lattice mismatch with CISe, 36 while the lattice mismatch for CISe–ZnS is ∼7%. 24 A lattice mismatch between core and shell materials can prevent the passivation of surface traps, which hamper the bright PL.…”
Section: Results and Disscussionmentioning
confidence: 99%