2004
DOI: 10.2981/wlb.2004.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allometric length‐weight relationships for benthic prey of aquatic wildlife in coastal marine habitats

Abstract: We developed models to estimate the soft tissue content of benthic marine inver tebrates that are prey for aquatic wildlife. Allometric regression models of tis sue wet weight with shell length for 10 species of benthic invertebrates had r2 values ranging from 0.29 for hermit crabs Pagurus longicarpus to 0.98 for green crabs Carcinus maenas. As a class, bivalves had the highest r2 values (0.84) and crustaceans the lowest (0.48). Energy and nutrient content of soft tissue is also presented for the 10 benthic sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that 1 ml O 2 equals 20.1 J [26], we converted the measured oxygen values (ml O 2 s 21 ) to energetic equivalents (J s -1 ). To account for the significant amount of metabolically inert body mass for the crab, prawn, seastar and gastropod species, soft tissue body masses were derived from measured wet weights using published relationships for these species [27][28][29].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that 1 ml O 2 equals 20.1 J [26], we converted the measured oxygen values (ml O 2 s 21 ) to energetic equivalents (J s -1 ). To account for the significant amount of metabolically inert body mass for the crab, prawn, seastar and gastropod species, soft tissue body masses were derived from measured wet weights using published relationships for these species [27][28][29].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, bias in energetic carrying capacity estimates resulting from core samples treated with H 2 O 2 may vary according the proportion of soft-bodied invertebrates in samples, which varies by habitats of waterbirds (e.g., moist-soil wetlands, mudflats; Osborn 2015). Significant bias may exist if biomass estimates are based on wet masses and alternative methods (e.g., length-weight models) may be better suited to estimate biomass from soft-bodied invertebrates exposed for long periods to H 2 O 2 (McKinney et al 2004). Scientists should avoid using H 2 O 2 for long-exposure times or adjust biomass estimates accordingly if biomass estimates are based on wet mass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aquatic invertebrates are used as food by waterbirds throughout their annual cycle and are particularly important during spring migration, feather molt, and the breeding season as a source of protein, lipids, and essential amino acids (Bellrose 1980;Loesch and Kaminski 1989;Richardson and Kaminski 1992;Anderson et al 2000;McKinney et al 2004). Often, scientists include aquatic invertebrate biomass with seeds, tubers, and other plant materials in estimates of food density that are used to determine energetic carrying capacity for waterbirds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schult found enough taxa so that we could do a species-level station-to-station ttest comparing the Providence River station with the North Jamestown reference station. Data from the waterfowl feeding study included 28 stations throughout the Bay (2.0 mm sieve; 30 species of macrofauna reported; McKinney et al, 2004;R. McKinney, unpublished data) and had adequate sample size to do a t-test on stations in each area.…”
Section: Biomass and Secondary Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%