2020
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allochthonous aquatic subsidies alleviate predation pressure in terrestrial ecosystems

Abstract: The input of external energy and matter in recipient ecosystems can act as a bottom-up force that subsidizes consumers, with subsequent cascading effects throughout the food web. Depending on the amount of input, dietary preference, and the strength of trophic links, allochthonous resources generally play a stabilizing role on food webs. In this study, we investigated the stabilizing role of allochthonous aquatic resources on intraguild predation (IGP) and their consequences on shared prey in a terrestrial eco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, food web stability is highly dependent on the trophic position of the subsidy recipient (Leroux & Loreau, 2008; Polis et al, 1997). Low amounts of inputs tend to support food web stability, whereas large, variable pulses of inputs can have a destabilizing effect through stronger trophic cascades (Huxel & McCann, 1998; Leroux & Loreau, 2008; McCary et al, 2021; Recalde et al, 2020). Understanding the pathways by which subsidies enter food webs and knowing who benefits from them can aid our understanding of individual‐level to community‐level consumer responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, food web stability is highly dependent on the trophic position of the subsidy recipient (Leroux & Loreau, 2008; Polis et al, 1997). Low amounts of inputs tend to support food web stability, whereas large, variable pulses of inputs can have a destabilizing effect through stronger trophic cascades (Huxel & McCann, 1998; Leroux & Loreau, 2008; McCary et al, 2021; Recalde et al, 2020). Understanding the pathways by which subsidies enter food webs and knowing who benefits from them can aid our understanding of individual‐level to community‐level consumer responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tailor this prediction by considering the types of subsidies considered here (i.e., wrack, feces, urine, and food scraps). Stronger upper‐level consumer pathways likely exist in salmon‐subsidized ecosystems (e.g., bears in Helfield & Naiman, 2006) or in ones with emerging aquatic invertebrates (e.g., birds, bats, and spiders in Recalde et al, 2020), where the subsidy is more attractive to upper‐level consumers. Collectively, testing these predictions allowed us to assess how island characteristics can affect both the enrichment of individual components of food webs and the flow of nutrients through island food webs, and, as a result, tie together key theories in island biogeography and food web ecology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aquatic insects underpin several key functions and services that freshwater ecosystems provide to tropical and subtropical regions. These include detritus processing and biogeochemical cycling, bioturbation, biological control and food sources that fuel and stabilize aquatic and terrestrial food webs [41,42]. Therefore, long-term anthropogenic impact monitoring and mitigation strategies are pivotal in maintaining freshwater ecosystem integrity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the loss of a top predator from the terrestrial ecosystem can alter the adjacent aquatic community structure and ecosystem functioning (Breviglieri & Romero, 2017;Romero & Srivastava, 2010). Additionally, changes in aquatic top predators can alter aquatic subsidies to terrestrial organisms (Greig et al, 2012), which could affect terrestrial interactions (Knight et al, 2005;Recalde et al, 2020). Also, despite the well-known effects of predators with different hunting mode on biodiversity and food web structure within ecosystems (Barton & Schmitz, 2009), minimal knowledge is available about how biotic and abiotic changes in an ecosystem (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%