2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0548(02)00033-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allocation of service time in a two-server system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In AHP, preferences between alternatives are determined by making pair-wise comparisons in which the decision maker examines two alternatives by considering one criterion and indicates a preference. These comparisons are made using a preference scale, which assigns numerical values to different levels of preference (Taha 2003). The standard preference scale used for AHP is 1-9 scale which lies between "equal importance" to "extreme importance" (Saaty 1989).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In AHP, preferences between alternatives are determined by making pair-wise comparisons in which the decision maker examines two alternatives by considering one criterion and indicates a preference. These comparisons are made using a preference scale, which assigns numerical values to different levels of preference (Taha 2003). The standard preference scale used for AHP is 1-9 scale which lies between "equal importance" to "extreme importance" (Saaty 1989).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, as discussed by El-Taha and Maddah (2006), high variability service time distributions also appear in repair facilities dealing with defects that require discernibly different repair times. For example, Kim and Yoo (2012), describe a real-world vending machine system with two modes of failures, minor and major, which yields high-variability repair times.…”
Section: Manuscript 1 Inmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In this paper, we build on our earlier research (El-Taha andMaddah 2006, Maddah et al 2010) and develop a new scheme, based on arranging servers into multiple stations. Specifically, we consider a queueing system consisting of c servers and a Poisson arrival process.…”
Section: Manuscript 1 Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pair-wised comparison is done such that one of the options is selected and the priority of both is measured [21]. In this process the numbers 1 to 9 are applied as a standard scale to determine the importance of the options (from equal importance to extremely high importance).…”
Section: Determining the Importance Of Criteria And Sub-criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%