2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00117.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allocation of Attention to Portfolio Companies and the Performance of Venture Capital Firms

Abstract: This article proposes that the attention allocated by venture capitalists to portfolio companies impacts their performance. The article develops arguments for optimal portfolio size and for the moderating roles of syndication frequency and role. The hypotheses receive support from analyses employing longitudinal data of the leading U.S. venture capital firms. Our results indicate the value of venture capitalist involvement and give guidance for its optimal allocation and syndication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
80
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(133 reference statements)
6
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By syndicating deals, VC fi rms are able to increase the portfolio they can optimally manage through resource sharing ( Jääskeläinen et al, 2006 ;Kanniainen and Keuschnigg, 2003 ). VC fi rms can access more information by syndicating with other reputable VC fi rms.…”
Section: Syndicated Private Equity Investments In Ipo Firmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By syndicating deals, VC fi rms are able to increase the portfolio they can optimally manage through resource sharing ( Jääskeläinen et al, 2006 ;Kanniainen and Keuschnigg, 2003 ). VC fi rms can access more information by syndicating with other reputable VC fi rms.…”
Section: Syndicated Private Equity Investments In Ipo Firmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En ce qui concerne la performance des investissements en CR, certains auteurs se sont intéressés aux facteurs qui peuvent l'influencer : l'âge, l'expé-rience (Sherpherd, Zacharakis et Baron, 2003) et le stade de développement de la SCR (Dimov et De Clercq, 2006), les objectifs stratégiques ou financiers poursuivis, le montant de financement et de contrôle par rapport au stade de développement de la firme, l'environnement (LeClaire, Hadden et Jaggers, 2001), la voie de sortie notamment par appel public à l'épargne (Wang et Sim, 2001), la motivation de l'entrepreneur et de ses salariés (Fellers, 2002), la taille du portefeuille et le degré de syndicalisation (Jääskeläinen, Maula et Seppä, 2006). Sur ce dernier point, étant donné l'effet négatif de la syndicalisation sur la performance des SCR, certaines recherches ont étudié les motivations de ce choix.…”
Section: Le Financement Par Capital-risque (Cr)unclassified
“…Post-investment monitoring and adding value are also common management practice in the VC industry with VC fund managers usually involved in the investee companies' management and board (Gorman & Sahlman, 1989;Jääskeläinen, Maula, & Seppä, 2006). It is nonetheless not straightforward to determine how this practice contributes individually to the ventures' development and success along with other measures, although their collective influence is obvious.…”
Section: Classic Venture Capital Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%