“…Adding to this pool of literature various noteworthy studies were conducted to capture the diverse dimensions of microfinance, for example, the theory on joint liability in group lending and repayment (Besley and Coate 1995), graduation from group lending to successful repayment (Rahman 1999), importance of social intermediation and participatory approach for sustainable village banks (Bennett et al 1996), financial intermediation roles of nongovernment organizations (Hiatt and Woodworth 2006), association between repayments and sustainability in thrift and credit groups (Handa and Kirton 1999), peer selection and joint liability in group lending (Ghatak 1999), rural poverty alleviation and development in developing nations (Khandker et al 1998;Mosley 2001;Hiatt and Woodworth 2006), microcredit lending models (Dasgupta 2005), fungibility of money and control on credit usages (Goetz and Sengupta 1996), women empowerment and gender roles (Kabeer 2005), importance of public resources, capital market and financial institutions in microfinance programmes (Mahajan 2005), microfinance impacts especially income effect, consumption effect, saving employment effect, empowerment effect, literacy effect (Morduch 1995;Khandker et al 1998;Rutherford 1998;Coleman 1999;Panda and Atibudhi 2010), impact assessment methodologies (Hulme 2000a;Karlan 2001) and the darker side of microfinance (Hulme 2000b).…”