Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Cosmetics

Laguna, C.; Cuadra, J. de la; Martín-González, B.; Zaragoza, V.; Martínez-Casimiro, L.; Alegre, V.

doi:10.1016/s1578-2190(09)70010-1

Cited by 17 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In this study, 10.6% (1298) of patch‐tested eczema patients ( n = 12302) were fragrance allergic. This makes fragrance allergy the second most common cause of contact allergy after nickel, in accordance with other studies (13–15).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Fragrance mix II in the baseline series contributes significantly to detection of fragrance allergy

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Fragrance mix II in the baseline series contributes significantly to detection of fragrance allergy

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Our finding that one patient reacted only to Euxyl K400 without a simultaneous reaction to MDBGN was quite surprising, because the sensitizer in Euxyl K400 is nearly always MDBGN 26 . We thought that this positive reaction could be attributable to higher concentration of MDBGN in Euxyl K400 or phenoxyethanol component of it.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 79%

“…25 Our finding that one patient reacted only to Euxyl K400 without a simultaneous reaction to MDBGN was quite surprising, because the sensitizer in Euxyl K400 is nearly always MDBGN. 26 We thought that this positive reaction could be attributable to higher concentration of MDBGN in Euxyl K400 or phenoxyethanol component of it. As both MDBGN and Euxyl K400 were separately found to be over the critical incidence of 1% in our study, we recommend that both of these should be included in the standard series.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis: is it useful to perform the cosmetic series in addition to the European standard series?

Ada

Seckın

2010

Acad Dermatol Venereol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Patch testing with cosmetic series in addition to the European standard series increased the capability to detect the relevant allergen/allergens, particularly in patients with a suspicion of cosmetic allergy. However, it is not practical and cost-effective to test those patients routinely with all 45 allergens in the cosmetic series. As the European baseline series which includes methyldibromo glutaronitrile is now widely used as the guideline minimum set of allergens for routine diagnostic patch test investigations, we additionally recommend Euxyl K400 and isopropyl myristate as the candidates for patch testing.

show abstract

“…For instance, the long‐term exposure to hormones in cosmetics could result in metabolic disorders and/or occurrence of cancer 3, 4. Overdosage of antibiotics can weaken the immunity system and even lead to death due to its hypersusceptibility 5. Thus, addition of either hormones or sulfanilamides to the cosmetics has been banned by both the European Union Directive 76/768/EEC and Hygienic Standard for Cosmetics of China.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trace detection of hormones and sulfonamides in viscous cosmetic products by neutral desorption extractive electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A sensitive method based on a geometry-independent neutral desorption (GIND) in combination with extractive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (EESI-MS) has been developed for fast detection of illicit additives such as sulfonamides and hormones in highly viscous cosmetic products. The method gave a low limit of detection (LOD) (in the range of 0.001-1 ng/g), acceptable relative standard deviation (RSD=6.8-11.4%) and reasonable recovery (87-116%) for direct measuring of nine types of hormones and sulfonamides in the cosmetic products. The average measurement time for two types of samples was less than 1 min. Trace amounts of analytes in commercial cosmetic products have been quantitatively detected, without any sample pretreatment. The experimental results showed that non-volatile illicit additives such as sulfonamides and hormones could be sensitively liberated using the GIND device for quantitative detection from the highly viscous cosmetic products, demonstrating that GIND-EESI-MS is a promising tool for high throughput, sensitive and quantitative analysis of highly complex viscous samples.

show abstract

Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Cosmetics

Cited by 17 publications

References 21 publications

Fragrance mix II in the baseline series contributes significantly to detection of fragrance allergy

Fragrance mix II in the baseline series contributes significantly to detection of fragrance allergy

Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis: is it useful to perform the cosmetic series in addition to the European standard series?

Trace detection of hormones and sulfonamides in viscous cosmetic products by neutral desorption extractive electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About