2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2019.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allele-specific genome editing of imprinting genes by preferentially targeting non-methylated loci using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 (SaCas9)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, it has been reported that BEs-induced RNA off-target editing acts in an sgRNA-independent manner 6 , 9 , thus we do not consider the sgRNA-dependent effects in the current study. While these findings remind us to reconsider the off-targeting activities of our and others’ reported dCas9-fused epigenome editing tools 24 , 25 . In addition, replacement of the deaminases or Cas9n of base editors, such as APOBEC3B, APOBEC3G, or YE1 variants, is a feasible strategy to reduce their sgRNA-independent DNA or RNA off-targeting activities 26 28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Besides, it has been reported that BEs-induced RNA off-target editing acts in an sgRNA-independent manner 6 , 9 , thus we do not consider the sgRNA-dependent effects in the current study. While these findings remind us to reconsider the off-targeting activities of our and others’ reported dCas9-fused epigenome editing tools 24 , 25 . In addition, replacement of the deaminases or Cas9n of base editors, such as APOBEC3B, APOBEC3G, or YE1 variants, is a feasible strategy to reduce their sgRNA-independent DNA or RNA off-targeting activities 26 28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Besides, it has been reported that BEs-induced RNA off-target editing acts in a sgRNA-independent manner [6,9], and we do not consider the sgRNA-dependent effects in the current study. While these ndings remind us to reconsider the off-targeting activities of our and others' reported dCas9-fused epigenome editing tools [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…ChIP-seq was performed as previously described 62 , 63 . Fresh tissues obtained during surgery were collected and digested into single cells or small cell aggregates, and ~1 × 10 5 cells were fixed with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min in PBS at room temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%