2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“All the King’s horses and all the King’s men…”: What is broken should not always be put back together again

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This research into preloading found that, of the 2,751 participants from Brisbane (the State capital of Queensland), more than 79% of people reported to preload and 71% returned a breath approximated blood alcohol content (BrAC) greater than zero, with both figures showing little difference between the genders. Further, and contrary to other research which used a retrospective methodology (see Devilly, 2018 for a discussion of this), it was found that the primary reason for preloading was 'to socialise', with 'to save money' being a close secondary reason. Seminal research in the United States (e.g., Borsari et al, 2007;Chaney et al, 2019) has demonstrated that preloading (or, pregaming, as termed there) is a unique predictor of intoxication and addiction in mandated students.…”
Section: Preloadingcontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This research into preloading found that, of the 2,751 participants from Brisbane (the State capital of Queensland), more than 79% of people reported to preload and 71% returned a breath approximated blood alcohol content (BrAC) greater than zero, with both figures showing little difference between the genders. Further, and contrary to other research which used a retrospective methodology (see Devilly, 2018 for a discussion of this), it was found that the primary reason for preloading was 'to socialise', with 'to save money' being a close secondary reason. Seminal research in the United States (e.g., Borsari et al, 2007;Chaney et al, 2019) has demonstrated that preloading (or, pregaming, as termed there) is a unique predictor of intoxication and addiction in mandated students.…”
Section: Preloadingcontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Recent research investigating alcohol use in Queensland NEDs (Devilly, Allen, and Brown, 2017) has found these districts to be particularly populated on Thursday, Friday, and Saturday nights by individuals typically in their early 20s (Mage = 22.61, SD = 5.49). Preloading (also referred to as "pre-drinking", "pre-gaming" or "pre-partying") occurs when people consume alcohol, individually or in groups, prior to entering NEDs, typically in a private house, hotel or suburban pub (Devilly, 2018;Devilly, Allen & Brown, 2017;Foster & Ferguson, 2014). This research into preloading found that, of the 2,751 participants from Brisbane (the State capital of Queensland), more than 79% of people reported to preload and 71% returned a breath approximated blood alcohol content (BrAC) greater than zero, with both figures showing little difference between the genders.…”
Section: Preloadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to medical health risks, ‘Alcohol fuelled violence’ is an oft-cited reason for temperance legislation and efforts to restrict opening hours of establishments selling alcohol. In Australia, this approach to violence reduction in NEDS has led to significant scientific [10, 11] and political [12] controversy. It is undisputed that there are more assaults and violent acts in Australian NEDs that stay open late and where alcohol is available, than in districts where alcohol is not available or where the clubs have earlier closing hours [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not all high aBAC readings were impacted by measurement error, which suggests external influences fluctuated aBAC readings ( Gullberg, 2006 ). We argue that participants should not be excluded at the first-point of contact based on experimenter observation because intoxication impacts all individuals differently and this approach will bias the sample (see Devilly, 2018 ). Understandably, if the participant is not able to proceed with the research—because of extreme intoxication and cognitive impairment—then it would be reasonable for the researcher to terminate the testing and count this as a ‘refusal’ or ‘omission due to impairment’ in the study attrition data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%