2013
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All-back-contact ultra-thin silicon nanocone solar cells with 13.7% power conversion efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
268
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 305 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
268
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Savin et al6 even demonstrated that Si nanopillars textured solar cell brings 3% higher in daily energy production as compared to the conventional Si micropyramids (SiMPs)‐textured solar cell, which benefits from its better angular acceptance. Hence, considerable efforts have been focused on integrating Si nanostructures into various solar cells, such as diffused homojunction cells,10, 11, 12 heterojunction cells,13, 14 photo‐electrochemical cells,15 hybrid cells,16, 17, 18 carrier‐selective contact cells,19 and ultrathin crystalline Si (c‐Si) cells 20…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Savin et al6 even demonstrated that Si nanopillars textured solar cell brings 3% higher in daily energy production as compared to the conventional Si micropyramids (SiMPs)‐textured solar cell, which benefits from its better angular acceptance. Hence, considerable efforts have been focused on integrating Si nanostructures into various solar cells, such as diffused homojunction cells,10, 11, 12 heterojunction cells,13, 14 photo‐electrochemical cells,15 hybrid cells,16, 17, 18 carrier‐selective contact cells,19 and ultrathin crystalline Si (c‐Si) cells 20…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minority carrier lifetimes in the millisecond range indicate excellent surface passivation of b-Si and are in the range needed for high-efficiency solar cells (>20%) 17,18 . Previous b-Si solar cell results have been limited to those from conventional front-side aluminium back surface field (Al-BSF) structures or ultrathin back-contacted cells 13 , probably because these structures are less sensitive to front surface recombination. Here, we study the potential of ALD Al 2 O 3 passivated b-Si to address the above-mentioned surface recombination problem present in nanostructured surfaces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that a high number of light-generated electron-hole pairs are lost in the nanostructures instead of being collected at the contacts, reducing the efficiency. Auger recombination can be avoided by using an interdigitated back contact (IBC) solar cell design where the junction and the contacts are placed at the back of the cell 13 , but the recombination problem due to the larger surface area remains unsolved. To date, the surface passivation issue has generally been addressed by rather conventional methods, such as depositing silicon nitride by means of plasmaenhanced chemical vapour deposition 14 or with thermally grown silicon dioxide 15 , resulting in tradeoffs between reflectance and recombination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the negative charge within the Al 2 O 3 layer accumulates or inverts the silicon surface on p-type and n-type material, respectively; thus, it remains unclear if the overall surface passivation of b-Si on n-type will reach the same excellent values as on p-type b-Si surface in finished IBC's solar cells. In fact, no efficiencies over 20% have been yet reported for n-type b-Si IBC's [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%