Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3025453.3025749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All about Acceptability?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It originated in information systems research and has been developed to study the "unwillingness" of employees to adopt a certain technology, with the goal to increase productivity [6]. It is, together with its later versions, widely used in the social acceptability literature (e.g., [23,24,34,35]). In its early versions, perceived usefulness and ease of use were studied as predictors of a worker's intention to use a technology, but over time several other variables were added.…”
Section: Technology Acceptance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It originated in information systems research and has been developed to study the "unwillingness" of employees to adopt a certain technology, with the goal to increase productivity [6]. It is, together with its later versions, widely used in the social acceptability literature (e.g., [23,24,34,35]). In its early versions, perceived usefulness and ease of use were studied as predictors of a worker's intention to use a technology, but over time several other variables were added.…”
Section: Technology Acceptance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social Acceptability Montero et al define social acceptability as the combination of the user's social acceptance, which defines how comfortable a user is in executing a particular action, as well as spectators' social acceptance, which refers to the impression it makes on witnesses of such action [37]. Interacting with eyewear displays need to be socially acceptable for public performancethis is especially relevant for eyewear given the current scepticism toward such devices [25]. While the social acceptability of actions may change as technologies become widespread [37], the likelihood of technology adoption is greatly improved if its interaction requirements are socially acceptable [12,45].…”
Section: Interaction In Pedestrian Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, depending on the context, interaction techniques can be perceived as socially inappropriate from the outside or as embarrassing by the user himself because it might affect the social image, especially for new and unknown classes of devices [Koelle, El Ali, et al, 2017]. For example, speaking to technology in public environments [Efthymiou and Halvey, 2016] or touching the groin area [Harrison and Faste, 2014] of the body are perceived as inappropriate.…”
Section: Requirement 12: Maximize Directness Of Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As another approach to interaction while walking, related work proposed voice-based interfaces. However, such systems may perform badly depending on background noise and have social implications [Koelle, El Ali, et al, 2017;Starner, 2002].…”
Section: R6mentioning
confidence: 99%