Towards a Better Understanding of Social Acceptability

Uhde, Alarith; Hassenzahl, Marc

doi:10.1145/3411763.3451649

Cited by 12 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 40 publications

(77 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…How a technology is perceived within a social context, i.e., its social acceptability, has an important role in its acceptance and use (12). Those who perceive a positive attitude to a behavior are more likely to engage in and maintain the behavior, including consumption of a product.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exposure to e-cigarette advertising and provaping websites, and the social acceptability of their use among nicotine users

Barrientos‐Gutiérrez

Gallegos‐Carrillo

Cruz-Jiménez

et al. 2022

Revista Panamericana De Salud Pública

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives. To evaluate the prevalence of exposure to Internet communications on and advertising of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and their association with perceptions of the social acceptability of e-cigarettes in Mexico. Methods. Data were analyzed from eight surveys (2018–2021) of an online sample of Mexican adult (> 18 years) smokers and dual users (of combustible and electronic cigarettes). Self-reported exposure to e-cigarette advertising across various marketing channels was assessed, as well as visits to e-cigarette websites. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between perceptions of the social acceptability of e-cigarette use and level of advertising exposure and visits to e-cigarette websites. Results. The Internet and outside e-cigarette stores were where exposure to advertising most occurred, as reported by 47.4% and 46.8% of respondents, respectively. Respondents who noticed e-cigarette advertisements on the Internet (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.43, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.25, 1.63), outside e-cigarette stores (adjusted OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.14, 1.50), and in temporary outlets (adjusted OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01, 1.34), and those who visited e-cigarette websites (adjusted OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.25, 1.76) were more likely to perceive e-cigarettes as socially acceptable. Noticing advertisements across more channels was also associated with higher perceived social acceptability of e-cigarette use. Conclusions. Being exposed to e-cigarette marketing, either online or through traditional marketing channels, is associated with perceived social acceptability of e-cigarette use, as is contact with provaping sites. Regulatory options to avoid the proliferation of promotional websites disguised as opinion or user sites need to be considered.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exposure to e-cigarette advertising and provaping websites, and the social acceptability of their use among nicotine users

Barrientos‐Gutiérrez

Gallegos‐Carrillo

Cruz-Jiménez

et al. 2022

Revista Panamericana De Salud Pública

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Social acceptability refers to the extent that a behaviour or action is considered acceptable or appropriate by a particular social group, within a particular context [32], [33]. On the other hand, "trust must be designed as a relationship between people and measured by their ability to depend on one another to play by a shared set of rules," [17].…”

Section: B Social Acceptability and Trustmentioning

confidence: 99%

To See and be Seen—Perceived Ethics and Acceptability of Pervasive Augmented Reality

Regenbrecht,

Knott,

Ferreira

et al. 2024

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Augmented reality (AR) glasses are likely to become omnipresent, providing a continuous and ubiquitous experience of computer-mediated reality. This new Pervasive AR will lead to perceptual, acceptance, and ethical issues which are increasingly discussed in the literature. However, given such Pervasive AR prototypes are currently not commercially available, little is known about potential end-users' input into this discussion. To address this, we developed a Pervasive AR (PAR) prototype serving as a technology probe and conducted an empirical study in a semi-public space involving 54 participants. We collected data from focus groups, questionnaires, and observations of users and bystanders. Extending concerns with existing technology, like smartphones and augmented reality, PAR exposes privacy and security breaches with its unprompted, all-seeing capability, has a higher potential to cause societal fractures and divisions, and raises new questions on information transparency and trust with significant implications for the design of future PAR systems.

show abstract

“…There is no such thing as a perfect artwork, a perfectly beautiful church, or the most aesthetically pleasing landscape architecture. There can only be an approximation to something like that for a specific sample of people or individuals [34] within a certain era and within defined situations and situational and social demands [35].…”

Section: Long-term Change Of Likingmentioning

confidence: 99%

About the Need for a More Adequate Way to Get an Understanding of the Experiencing of Aesthetic Items

Carbon

2023

Behavioral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We live in times when neuroscientific methods have become standard methods that many researchers can easily use. While this offers excellent opportunities to understand brain activities linked with aesthetic processing, we face the problem of using sophisticated techniques without a proper and valid theoretical foundation of aesthetics. A further problem arises from sophisticated methods often demanding strict constraints in presenting and experiencing aesthetic stimuli. However, when experiencing aesthetic items, contextual factors matter, e.g., social and situational affordances are essential in triggering a true and deep “Kunsterlebnis” (Experience of Art). Additionally, in Art, it is often not the artwork as an object that matters but the close relationship with and the processing of the artwork. However, art is only one facet of the whole aesthetic domain, beside, e.g., design, architecture, everyday aesthetics, dance, literature, music, and opera. In the present paper, I propose a dynamic and holistic aesthetic perspective that includes the respective context, situation, cognitive and affective traits and state of the beholder, ongoing processes of understanding, Zeitgeist, and other cultural factors, which can be applied to different aesthetic domains. When ignoring such temporal and dynamic factors, we will not understand the qualia of aesthetic processing. These considerations might help researchers in the field of aesthetics to better understand the experiencing of aesthetic items of all kinds—if we ignore these factors, we are missing the essence of experiencing aesthetic items, especially artworks. We aim to sensitize and inform readers about these ideas to inspire a deeper understanding of experiencing aesthetic items and the advancement of a theoretical framework addressing the experiencing of aesthetics from different domains.

show abstract

Towards a Better Understanding of Social Acceptability

Cited by 12 publications

References 40 publications

Exposure to e-cigarette advertising and provaping websites, and the social acceptability of their use among nicotine users

Exposure to e-cigarette advertising and provaping websites, and the social acceptability of their use among nicotine users

To See and be Seen—Perceived Ethics and Acceptability of Pervasive Augmented Reality

About the Need for a More Adequate Way to Get an Understanding of the Experiencing of Aesthetic Items

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About