Goldschmidt Abstracts 2020
DOI: 10.46427/gold2020.1885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alkalinity in Tidal Tributaries of the Chesapeake Bay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seasonal pattern of Ca 2+ removal (or CaCO 3 formation) in the upper Bay generally coincides with the seasonal cycle of aboveground biomass of SAV in Chesapeake Bay (Moore et al 2000; Gurbisz et al 2017), which begins to increase in late spring, reaches a growth peak in the late summer, and declines in the fall, making SAV‐driven CaCO 3 formation a strong candidate process for CaCO 3 sources in Chesapeake Bay. However, Najjar et al (2019) suggested that bivalve calcification was more explanatory than SAV coverage to interpret a significant TA sink in the low salinity zone of Potomac River Estuary, one of the main tributaries in Chesapeake Bay. It is clear that both abiotic precipitation and the activity of marine calcifiers (e.g., SAV leaves, epiphytes, bivalves) can contribute to sinks of Ca 2+ and TA in low‐salinity waters, but how the CaCO 3 solids can be transported downstream and support further carbonate dissolution in the mid‐bay subsurface water needs additional explanation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The seasonal pattern of Ca 2+ removal (or CaCO 3 formation) in the upper Bay generally coincides with the seasonal cycle of aboveground biomass of SAV in Chesapeake Bay (Moore et al 2000; Gurbisz et al 2017), which begins to increase in late spring, reaches a growth peak in the late summer, and declines in the fall, making SAV‐driven CaCO 3 formation a strong candidate process for CaCO 3 sources in Chesapeake Bay. However, Najjar et al (2019) suggested that bivalve calcification was more explanatory than SAV coverage to interpret a significant TA sink in the low salinity zone of Potomac River Estuary, one of the main tributaries in Chesapeake Bay. It is clear that both abiotic precipitation and the activity of marine calcifiers (e.g., SAV leaves, epiphytes, bivalves) can contribute to sinks of Ca 2+ and TA in low‐salinity waters, but how the CaCO 3 solids can be transported downstream and support further carbonate dissolution in the mid‐bay subsurface water needs additional explanation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the relatively consistent ocean endmember values, large variations exist in the riverine endmember due to the temporal variations of freshwater discharge (Joesoef et al 2017; Najjar et al 2019). Previous study has revealed that the riverine carbonate endmembers negatively correlate with river discharge (Su et al 2020 a ), thus we derived the riverine endmember of DIC, TA, and Ca 2+ from the specific discharge rate during each cruise period and 10 d prior (Joesoef et al 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Secondly, due to the lack of observations required for developing model parameterizations suitable for the time and space scales analyzed here, the biogeochemical module does not include calcium carbonate cycling. Finally, Herrmann et al (2020) estimated that organic alkalinity concentration in the Chesapeake Bay has a mean of 20 meq m −3 and standard deviation of 30 meq m −3 , which are both much smaller than typical TA concentrations throughout the main stem Bay (600–2,200 meq m −3 ; Najjar et al., 2020). Therefore, organic alkalinity is assumed to be insignificant in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Najjar et al. (2020) identified TA increases over many decades in tidal tributaries of the Chesapeake Bay, including the upper main stem Bay, which reflected a combination of increasing riverine TA and, in the Potomac River Estuary, a declining TA sink.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%