2015
DOI: 10.1109/jstqe.2015.2432025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alignment Tolerant Couplers for Silicon Photonics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After increasing the Rx bandwidth (here increasing the oscilloscope bandwidth throttling the link), this would, however, require a 25/14∼1.8 times increase in the EDFA input power per channel to maintain the same ASE limited Q-factor. By removing the intermediate fiber between the laser and the SiP chip [64,65], and thus removing an optical interface, and by improving the grating coupler losses, this power level can be reached. Moreover, SS-MLLs with a slightly larger FSR are also expected to emit more power per comb line (the optimum in this regard is for a FSR on the order of 70-100 GHz, above 100 GHz, the power per comb line drops again due to the decreased cavity size).…”
Section: Nf/10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After increasing the Rx bandwidth (here increasing the oscilloscope bandwidth throttling the link), this would, however, require a 25/14∼1.8 times increase in the EDFA input power per channel to maintain the same ASE limited Q-factor. By removing the intermediate fiber between the laser and the SiP chip [64,65], and thus removing an optical interface, and by improving the grating coupler losses, this power level can be reached. Moreover, SS-MLLs with a slightly larger FSR are also expected to emit more power per comb line (the optimum in this regard is for a FSR on the order of 70-100 GHz, above 100 GHz, the power per comb line drops again due to the decreased cavity size).…”
Section: Nf/10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in the bottom panel, the power coupled in either waveguide is equal and remains within 1 dB of its nominal value (centered fiber) within a ±7.2 µm misalignment range in the transverse/lateral direction (red arrow in the micrograph), a tolerance almost 3X larger than a conventional grating coupler. In the longitudinal direction, the [13] and (bottom) corresponding coupling efficiency into either of the two output waveguides (black and red curves) as well as the cumulative coupling efficiency (solid blue curve) as compared to a regular single mode grating coupler (SMGC) fabricated in the same technology (dash dotted blue curve). The transverse misalignment, as shown by the red arrow in the micrograph, is indicated on the x-axis.…”
Section: Passive Biasing Of Mzms By Means Of Multimode Couplersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the interferometer branches is routed around the first MMGC (red arrow) in order to maintain the phase sensitivity of the device [13]. other out [13]. Note that this requires one waveguide to be routed around the first MMGC as indicated by a red arrow.…”
Section: Combined Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, lateral displacements of the input light source over a large range do not significantly penalize Insertion Losses (ILs) or splitting imbalance. Thus, multimode couplers have been proposed to relax the alignment tolerances for efficient fiber-to-chip coupling with a demonstrated three-fold improvement in comparison with conventional single mode couplers 9,13 . In a MMGC, the input displacement is converted into a relative phase shift between the outputs.…”
Section: Passively Biased Scheme With Multimode Grating Couplermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, an integration scheme passively sets the 3 dB point during attachment of the input fiber relative to a misalignment tolerant Multimode Grating Coupler (MMGC) also used as the splitter element of the interferometer 9 . This scheme avoids the necessity of corrective phase tuners and the associated power consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%