2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2016.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alignment algorithms and per-particle CTF correction for single particle cryo-electron tomography

Abstract: Single particle cryo-electron tomography (cryoSPT) extracts features from cryo-electron tomograms, followed by 3D classification, alignment and averaging to generate improved 3D density maps of such features. Robust methods to correct for the contrast transfer function (CTF) of the electron microscope are necessary for cryoSPT to reach its resolution potential. Many factors can make CTF correction for cryoSPT challenging, such as lack of eucentricity of the specimen stage, inherent low dose per image, specimen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(115 reference statements)
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A subsequent 2D classification identified near top, tilted and side views; the latter provided an independent estimate of NPC thickness perpendicular to the NE (620–640 Å). A 3D reconstruction with the best sub-tomograms produced a map at ~35 Å resolution (data not shown) with similar features to those obtained with the e2spt package 75,76 , including distinct connections between each spoke and the transporter, further validating the features in our Cryo-ET map (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A subsequent 2D classification identified near top, tilted and side views; the latter provided an independent estimate of NPC thickness perpendicular to the NE (620–640 Å). A 3D reconstruction with the best sub-tomograms produced a map at ~35 Å resolution (data not shown) with similar features to those obtained with the e2spt package 75,76 , including distinct connections between each spoke and the transporter, further validating the features in our Cryo-ET map (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…After interactive test runs with etomo 74 , we processed the tilt series in an automated fashion with batchtomo using a 7 × 7 patch tracking to create aligned tilt series and calculated back-projection and SIRT tomograms which were CTF-corrected by phase-flipping each image in the tilt series (Supplementary Power Point Presentation, slides 3–6). The final SIRT tomograms were binned 3× and used for interactive sub-tomogram "particle" picking with e2spt_boxer.py in the EMAN2 single particle tomography package 75,76 with a low pass filter of 100 Å. In total 6,416 fully sampled unfiltered sub-tomograms were extracted from the back-projection tomograms in 300 × 300 × 300 voxel volumes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), using only a few hundred icosahedrally symmetric virus particles (Galaz-Montoya et al 2016a). Most importantly, the defocus gradient due to tilting was fitted by directly measuring the power spectrum in strips of constant defocus, similar to the method proposed by Fernández et al (2006), except that it was done on each individual image ( i.e.…”
Section: Challenges In Single Particle Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images of a tilt series can then be aligned to reconstruct a tomogram (see for example Briggs, ; Lučič et al., ; Dubrovsky et al., ; Asano et al., ). If common sub‐structures exist these can be extracted as sub‐tomograms, aligned and averaged to form sub‐tomogram averages with an improved signal‐to‐noise ratio (Wan et al., ; Galaz‐Montoya et al., ). Such approaches have been used in the past to analyse, for example, the cellular structure of the nuclear pore complex (NPC), of membrane‐bound ribosomes, of actin filaments in combination with segmentation tools and template‐based identification of the components (Frangakis et al., ; Medalia et al., ; Beck et al., ; Ortiz et al., ).…”
Section: Cryo‐et Analysis and Sub‐tomogram Averagingmentioning
confidence: 99%