Alien aquatic vascular plants in Hungary (Pannonian ecoregion): Historical aspects, data set and trends

Lukács, Balázs András; Mesterházy, Attila; Vidéki, Róbert; Király, Gergely

doi:10.1080/11263504.2014.987846

Cited by 34 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also presence of alien aquatic species and species with Atlantic or Boreal distribution can play important role. Number of aquatic alien species in Slovakia is much lower than in Hungary (Medvecká et al, 2012;Lukács et al, 2016). Atlantic and boreal aquatic plant species, which are relatively frequent in Poland, are absent in Western Carpathian region in Slovakia (cf.…”

Section: Species Diversitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Artificial ponds in Central Europe do not fall behind the natural ponds in terms of macrophyte diversity

Bubíková

Hrivnák

2018

Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

-We studied macrophyte composition and 24 environmental variables in 69 ponds of both natural and artificial origin in Slovakia. We tested differences in a and g diversity and b similarity between natural and artificial ponds for helophytes, hydrophytes, red list species and all species. We also assessed effects of environmental variables on species richness of studied ponds by generalised linear models (GLM). For local diversity, the significant difference was obtained only in case of helophytes. Beta similarity significantly differed for all the species groups. Total species numbers (gamma diversity) of all the groups were higher in natural ponds with the exception of hydrophytes. A randomization test of g diversity yielded significant differences for helophytes and all species groups; richness and diversity of hydrophytes and red list species were not significantly different. Thus, we can conclude that even though natural ponds have a significantly higher regional diversity, local diversity is comparable not only for common species but also endangered red-listed macrophytes and thus artificial ponds could serve as proper secondary habitats for macrophytes. GLM showed different effect of environmental predictors on richness of studied species and pond groups and a slightly higher explained variability in natural (40%) compared to artificial (37%) ponds.Keywords: comparative diversity / lentic habitats / aquatic plants / species richness Résumé -Les mares artificielles d'Europe centrale ne sont pas en retard par rapport aux mares naturelles en termes de diversité des macrophytes. Nous avons étudié la composition des macrophytes et 24 variables environnementales dans 69 mares d'origine naturelle et artificielle en Slovaquie. Nous avons testé les différences de diversité a et g et de similitude b entre les mares naturelles et artificielles pour les hélophytes, les hydrophytes, les espèces de la liste rouge et toutes les espèces. Nous avons également évalué les effets des variables environnementales sur la richesse en espèces des mares étudiées à l'aide de modèles linéaires généralisés (GLM). En ce qui concerne la diversité locale, une différence significative n'a été obtenue que dans le cas des hélophytes. La similarité bêta était significativement différente pour tous les groupes d'espèces. Le nombre total d'espèces (diversité gamma) de tous les groupes était plus élevé dans les mares naturelles, à l'exception des hydrophytes. Un test de randomisation de la diversité g a produit des différences significatives pour les hélophytes et tous les groupes d'espèces; la richesse et la diversité des hydrophytes et des espèces de la liste rouge n'étaient pas significativement différentes. Par conséquent, nous pouvons conclure que même si les mares naturelles présentent une diversité régionale nettement plus grande, la diversité locale est comparable non seulement pour les espèces communes, mais aussi pour les macrophytes inscrits sur la liste rouge, ce qui fait que les mares artificielles pourraient servir d'habi...

show abstract

Section: Species Diversitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Artificial ponds in Central Europe do not fall behind the natural ponds in terms of macrophyte diversity

Bubíková

Hrivnák

2018

Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2002), New Zealand (Timmins & Mackenzie 1995;Howell 2008), Japan (Suyama 2001;Kadono 2004), China and Taiwan (Gao & Liu 2007;Gao & Chen 2011). In Europe, it has been known since 1988 from the thermal lake of Hévíz, Hungary (Szabó 1998(Szabó , 2002Hussner 2012;Lukács & al. 2014), the northernmost growing site within its range.…”

Section: Worldwide Distribution Ecology and Pathways Of Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Independent Origins of Aquatic Eupatorieae (Asteraceae)

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Dancza and Király 2000, Mesterházy 2005, Bátori et al 2012, trade and irresponsible planting of aquatic plants (e.g. Király et al 2008, Lukács et al 2016, agricultural management and trade of various crops (e.g. Csiky et al 2004, Partosfalvi et al 2008, Mesterházy and Király 2013, furthermore to the use of ornamental plants or fruits (e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…

Király, G. (2016): An invader at the edge of the world: Sporobolus neglectus (Poaceae) discovered at a remote locality in Hungary. -Studia bot.

…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Title: An invader at the edge of the world: Sporobolus neglectus (Poaceae) discovered at a remote locality in Hungary

Király¹

2016

Studia bot. hung.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Király, G. (2016): An invader at the edge of the world: Sporobolus neglectus (Poaceae) discovered at a remote locality in Hungary. -Studia bot. hung. 47(2): 335-344. Abstract:In 2016, Sporobolus neglectus, a new alien grass species of North American origin has been recognized in Hungary in a particular situation: within a widely isolated part of the Duna-Dráva National Park. Th e locality is situated S of Vízvár village on the right bank of the Drava River in the territory "Jama", encompassed (excluding the eastern side bordered by Drava) from all directions by Croatian territories. S. neglectus composed a dense stand on 0.2 hectares in a secondary sandy grassland, its dominance is likely supported by the damages caused by wild boar. Th e establishment of the species in Jama territory is not in accordance with the inundations of the Drava River; also an accidental introduction from the Hungarian mainland seems to be very unlikely. Th e stand of S. neglectus was introduced here probably in connection with wild game feeding made by illegal hunters coming from Croatia. In view of the locality near Vízvár, the species is able to colonize barren sandy surfaces in mass; accordingly, it is a potential invader in the dry sandy grasslands of Hungary, especially in the neighbouring Belső-Somogy region.

show abstract

Alien aquatic vascular plants in Hungary (Pannonian ecoregion): Historical aspects, data set and trends

Cited by 34 publications

References 26 publications

Artificial ponds in Central Europe do not fall behind the natural ponds in terms of macrophyte diversity

Artificial ponds in Central Europe do not fall behind the natural ponds in terms of macrophyte diversity

Independent Origins of Aquatic Eupatorieae (Asteraceae)

Title: An invader at the edge of the world: Sporobolus neglectus (Poaceae) discovered at a remote locality in Hungary

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About