1992
DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(92)90032-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms for robust single and multiple period layout planning for manufacturing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the concept of dynamic layout problems has been introduced by several researchers. According to [6][7], dynamic layout problems take into account possible changes in the material handling flow over multiple periods. In the dynamic facility layout problem (DFLP), the planning horizon is generally divided into certain periods which may be defined in weeks, months, or even years.…”
Section: Facility Layout Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the concept of dynamic layout problems has been introduced by several researchers. According to [6][7], dynamic layout problems take into account possible changes in the material handling flow over multiple periods. In the dynamic facility layout problem (DFLP), the planning horizon is generally divided into certain periods which may be defined in weeks, months, or even years.…”
Section: Facility Layout Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This layout may not be optimal under any specific scenario, but it is also not too far off from the optimal under all possible scenarios [64]. Heuristic strategies for developing robust layouts for multiple planning periods are presented in [47]. Palekar et al [62] consider uncertainties explicitly in determining plant layout.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the literature, including papers that deal with dynamic environments, relies on measures of expected material handling efficiency -a weighted sum of travel distances incurred by the material handling system -in evaluating candidate layouts. Few papers, such as [47] and [65], use a robustness criteria where instead of mean performance, a layout is evaluated by its ability to guarantee a certain level of performance for each period or under each scenario. Others have used a combined mean and variance criterion to minimize the range of fluctuation in performance -see for example [61].…”
Section: A Classification Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the most flexible (robust) layout is the one whose cost performance remains close to the optimal layout for the largest number of scenarios. A robustness approach to the single and multiple period layout problem is also proposed by Kouvelis et al [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%