2010
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-s4-s24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms and semantic infrastructure for mutation impact extraction and grounding

Abstract: BackgroundMutation impact extraction is a hitherto unaccomplished task in state of the art mutation extraction systems. Protein mutations and their impacts on protein properties are hidden in scientific literature, making them poorly accessible for protein engineers and inaccessible for phenotype-prediction systems that currently depend on manually curated genomic variation databases.ResultsWe present the first rule-based approach for the extraction of mutation impacts on protein properties, categorizing their… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So in [2] we explored the possibility of using semantic technologies for exporting the text mining pipeline outputs according to a domain specific knowledge representation. Currently, our system, like mSTRAP [5], delivers its results in the form of an OWL ABox, i.e., as a collection of logical statements characterising the extracted mutations, proteins and impacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So in [2] we explored the possibility of using semantic technologies for exporting the text mining pipeline outputs according to a domain specific knowledge representation. Currently, our system, like mSTRAP [5], delivers its results in the form of an OWL ABox, i.e., as a collection of logical statements characterising the extracted mutations, proteins and impacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to disease variant extraction, EnzyMiner has difficulty associating variants to the correct enzyme when multiple enzymes are present in the same abstract and thus may benefit from natural language processing. Laurila et al created a method to extract variants (using MutationFinder) and impact relations from abstracts[110]. Finally, Naderi et al extended this work and developed the Open Mutation Miner[111] to extract variants and impact relations using an ontology model for variant impact relations.…”
Section: Variant Extraction From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of information extraction techniques in pharmacogenomics resulted, for example, in the creation of tools for the extraction of pharmacogenomic concepts and relationships [24], the automatic construction of databases such as SIDER [10], the completion of pharmacokinetics pathways [25], the creation of a Pharmacogenomic Relationships Ontology (PHARE) [26], and the extraction of mutation impacts on protein properties that were used to populate the Mutation Impact Ontology [27]. One limitation of NLP approaches is the lack of available text corpora where genes, drugs, phenotypes and their relationships are manually annotated.…”
Section: Extracting Knowledge From the Pharmacogenomics Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%