2018
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2018.2842222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithm of Linear Induction Motor Control for Low Normal Force of Magnetic Levitation Train Propulsion System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…22 shows eddy current distributio n fo r short shell. The calculated differential induced voltage is 110 µV in long shell aluminum model and it becomes 66 µV in short shell aluminum model due to the modified path for induced eddy currents [23]- [24]. Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…22 shows eddy current distributio n fo r short shell. The calculated differential induced voltage is 110 µV in long shell aluminum model and it becomes 66 µV in short shell aluminum model due to the modified path for induced eddy currents [23]- [24]. Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Up to now, the main suspension control methods include PID control, fuzzy logic control, sliding mode control (SMC), neural network and Genetic Algorithm (NNGA), etc. These methods are mainly applied in the suspension control of maglev bearing [15][16][17], maglev train [18][19][20], maglev plane motor [21][22][23] and maglev ball [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the permanent magnet machines (PMM), induction motor (IM) is one of the most commonly used propulsion machines in the electrical propulsion applications [1][2][3]. Comparatively speaking, although IM has the advantages of low cost, robust structure, high reliability and demagnetization-free risks, the energy conversion efficiency of an IM-based drive system is lower than a PMM-based system [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%