2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithm-based artifact reduction in patients with arms-down positioning in computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These cases are the same ones used in a previous study of our laboratory team [ 14 ] that purposed improvement of image texture in the MAR image generated using original projection data. To quantitatively compare the artifact strengths of the two NMAR methods, we measured the normalized artifact index AI n , which is defined as follows: where SD A denotes the standard deviation (SD) measured of the CT image with metal artifacts; SD B is the SD measured of the CT image with no metal artifacts [ 15 ]. The normalization using SD B was adopted because the spatial resolution of the image reconstructed based on the FP-data is slightly different from that of the image reconstructed from the original projection data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cases are the same ones used in a previous study of our laboratory team [ 14 ] that purposed improvement of image texture in the MAR image generated using original projection data. To quantitatively compare the artifact strengths of the two NMAR methods, we measured the normalized artifact index AI n , which is defined as follows: where SD A denotes the standard deviation (SD) measured of the CT image with metal artifacts; SD B is the SD measured of the CT image with no metal artifacts [ 15 ]. The normalization using SD B was adopted because the spatial resolution of the image reconstructed based on the FP-data is slightly different from that of the image reconstructed from the original projection data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%