2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of streak artifacts caused by low photon counts utilizing an image-based forward projection in computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is necessary to point out that the most important artifacts present in real cardiac CT databases, synchronized by electrocardiographic signal, are those of type staircase and dark band [3,4]. The first artifact occurs when the electrocardiogram trigger is not correctly synchronized with the cardiac phase or when it overlaps the reconstructed sections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to point out that the most important artifacts present in real cardiac CT databases, synchronized by electrocardiographic signal, are those of type staircase and dark band [3,4]. The first artifact occurs when the electrocardiogram trigger is not correctly synchronized with the cardiac phase or when it overlaps the reconstructed sections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The processing technique used in forward projection was the same as that used in reducing streak artifacts by utilizing FP-data as reported by our laboratory team [ 3 ]. The report demonstrated that the CT images reconstructed from filtered FP-data had almost the same spatial resolution as that of the original images and had precisely the same CT numbers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this potential has not been exploited widely so far. For example, to our best knowledge, only one paper reports its use in reducing the streak artifacts caused by low photon counts [ 3 ]. This limited use seems to be attributable to the large amount of computing time, and therefore cost, required for FP and the subsequent filter back projection (FBP) to reconstruct a CT image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the widely used equation for deriving CT numbers from attenuation data, each piece of data was transformed into a proportional function of its attenuation coefficient. The link between the numerical FP coordinates and the sampled data is depicted in Figure 3b, in which a projection data array is fixed and the position is interpolation [35]. In each ray position, the data sampling was repeated and accumulated at each projection angle 𝜃 as follows: Pθfalse(tfalse)=lnfalse(I0/Ifalse)=lθ,tμ()x,ydlnewline=μx,yδfalse(xcosθgoodbreak+ysinθgoodbreak−tfalse)dxdy,$$\begin{eqnarray} {P_\theta }(t) &=& \ln ({I_0}/I) = \int_{{l_{\theta ,t}}} {\mu \left( {x,y} \right)dl}\nonumber \\ &=& \int_{ - \infty }^\infty {\int_{ - \infty }^\infty {\mu \left( {x,y} \right)\delta (x\cos \theta + y\sin \theta - t)} } dxdy, \end{eqnarray}$$…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the widely used equation for deriving CT numbers from attenuation data, each piece of data was transformed into a proportional function of its attenuation coefficient. The link between the numerical FP coordinates and the sampled data is depicted in Figure 3b, in which a projection data array is fixed and the position is interpolation [35]. In each ray position, the data sampling was repeated and accumulated at each projection angle 𝜃 as follows:…”
Section: Forward Projection Processing and Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%