1999
DOI: 10.1145/317275.317286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithm 795

Abstract: Polynomial systems occur in a wide variety of application domains. Homotopy continuation methods are reliable and powerful methods to compute numerically approximations to all isolated complex solutions. During the last decade considerable progress has been accomplished on exploiting structure in a polynomial system, in particular its sparsity. In this article the structure and design of the software package PHC is described. The main program operates in several modes, is menu driven, and is file oriented. Thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
317
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 462 publications
(318 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
317
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implementation. We have two Maple implementations of our algorithms using the package PHCmaple [17] to interface with PHCpack [33], which performs the numerical polynomial homotopy continuation. PHCmaple produced the graphic of Figure 3.…”
Section: Description Of Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Implementation. We have two Maple implementations of our algorithms using the package PHCmaple [17] to interface with PHCpack [33], which performs the numerical polynomial homotopy continuation. PHCmaple produced the graphic of Figure 3.…”
Section: Description Of Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the continuation, both implementations use PHCpack [33] through its Maple interface PHCmaple [17], and the second implementation may also call Bertini [1]. The advantages of Bertini are that it can use arbitrary precision and it gives an independent verification of our results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second one solves the same linkage but assuming that θ 3 is a free variable, yielding a onedimensional continuum of solutions. The same benchmarks have been used previously to show the performance of elimination [15,16], continuation [17,18], and relaxation techniques [2]. We compare our results with those derived by such techniques, and employ the same linkage dimensions used in these papers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have checked, however, that our method converges in substantially shorter times than those used by the continuation method in [17,18], using the implementation available at Jan Verschelde's home page, which spent about 3 seconds of CPU time on the same example. We remark, though, that we are comparing our algorithm with a general-purpose solver targeted to arbitrary systems of algebraic equations, and that a better performance of our algorithm was to be expected, given that we exploit the specific structure of the equations involved.…”
Section: A Rigid Butterflymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithms outlined above have been implemented with the aid of the path following routines in PHCpack [23]. Recently the package has been upgraded with a module (see [20] for an overview) to numerically decompose solution sets of polynomial systems into irreducible components.…”
Section: A Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%