2008
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.77.032115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algebraic approach to two-dimensional systems: Shape phase transitions, monodromy, and thermodynamic quantities

Abstract: We analyze shape phase transitions in two-dimensional algebraic models. We apply our analysis to linearto-bent transitions in molecules and point out what observables are particularly sensitive to the transition ͑order parameters͒. We study numerically the scaling behavior of observables and confirm the dependence of the energy gap for phase transitions of U͑n͒-SO͑n +1͒ type. We calculate energies of excited states and show their unusual behavior for some values of the Hamiltonian control parameter. This behav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
251
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
9
251
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This requires the identification of physical systems described by algebraic Hamiltonians with ξ > ξ c for which states with quantum numbers k >> 1 can be observed. The most promising situations thus far are in molecules described by s-b boson models [30]. Further examples are needed to fully understand the experimental implications of the ESQPT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This requires the identification of physical systems described by algebraic Hamiltonians with ξ > ξ c for which states with quantum numbers k >> 1 can be observed. The most promising situations thus far are in molecules described by s-b boson models [30]. Further examples are needed to fully understand the experimental implications of the ESQPT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For states in the vicinity of the ground state QPT, the gap vanishes more quickly than N −1 , as the power law ∆ ∼ N −4/3 . This has been established both numerically and analytically for the various models under consideration [30,44,[49][50][51][52]. 7 The gap at the excited state QPT also approaches zero more rapidly than ∆ ∼ N −1 .…”
Section: Finite-size Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations