Alexander of Aphrodisias : a source of Origen’s philosophy ?

Ramelli, Ilaria

doi:10.4000/philosant.807

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…44 Ilaria Ramelli suggests that Origen's characterisation of God as νοῦς, in this chapter and elsewhere, is influenced by Alexander of Aphrodisias's earlier identification of the Aristotelean first cause with the νοῦς. 45 This identification is corroborated, in Origen, by the famous passage in Contra Celsum 7 38: Νοῦν τοίνυν ἢ ἐπέκεινα νοῦ καὶ οὐσίας λέγοντες εἶναι ἁπλοῦν καὶ ἀόρατον καὶ ἀσώματον τὸν τῶν ὅλων θεόν. In addition, Ramelli's observation is consonant with our earlier identification of πρῶτον ἀγαθόν as a possible influence from Alexander.…”

Section: Antecedents and Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 84%

What is Evagrian ΓΝΩΣΙΣ?

Muller¹

2023

The Heythrop Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evagrius famously characterises divine nature as γνῶσις οὐσιώδης, ‘substantial knowledge’. In the Alexandrian, Cappadocian, and other intellectual contexts informed by Platonic, Aristotelian, and Philonic thought, characterisations of God as a noetic or intellectual being are fairly common. However, these traditions concur in using the term νοῦς rather than γνῶσις. How can we explain that Evagrius deviates from the metaphysical mainstream? In this paper, I review this question from an historical and systematic point of view. I propose to examine ancient theories of Mind about the function and structure of the νοῦς, compare them to the Evagrian theory, and identify a possible explanation for the substitution of γνῶσις to the νοῦς. Since God is the key element in Evagrius's metaphysics, a clearer vision of the divine essence will help us appreciate the whole system more fully.

show abstract

Section: Antecedents and Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 84%