2015
DOI: 10.1037/pha0000011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alcohol-related and negatively valenced cues increase motor and oculomotor disinhibition in social drinkers.

Abstract: Our aim in the present study was to investigate the psychological mechanisms that underlie the disinhibiting effects of alcohol cues in social drinkers by contrasting motor and oculomotor inhibition after exposure to alcohol-related, emotional, and neutral pictures. We conducted 2 studies in which social drinkers completed modified stop-signal (laboratory) and antisaccade (online) tasks in which positive, negative, alcohol-related, and neutral pictures were embedded. We measured cue-specific disinhibition in e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
26
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although research suggests that individuals will be more disinhibited when exposed to alcohol-related cues (Jones & Field, 2015;Weafer & Fillmore, 2015), the current study's failure to find an influence of drinking context on risk-taking, may demonstrate the significance of the social group itself. In other words, in non-alcohol-related environments, the presence of others may still heighten risktaking behaviour (c.f., Erskine-Shaw et al, 2017; E. K. Reynolds et al, 2013) to a level comparable to the effects of alcohol-related cues in drinking environments.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…Although research suggests that individuals will be more disinhibited when exposed to alcohol-related cues (Jones & Field, 2015;Weafer & Fillmore, 2015), the current study's failure to find an influence of drinking context on risk-taking, may demonstrate the significance of the social group itself. In other words, in non-alcohol-related environments, the presence of others may still heighten risktaking behaviour (c.f., Erskine-Shaw et al, 2017; E. K. Reynolds et al, 2013) to a level comparable to the effects of alcohol-related cues in drinking environments.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…D. Remmerswaal, et al Drug and Alcohol Dependence 204 (2019) 107479 2013). Further research is needed to investigate how self-control relates to other constructs in the natural environment such as alcohol-related cues (Jones and Field, 2015) and self-control demands (Muraven et al, 2005). The present study benefitted from using a sample that consisted of participants from the general population regular drinkers which increases the generalizability of the findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals with low sensitivity to the acute effects of alcohol exhibit automatic approach biases towards alcohol-related visual stimuli, and experience more conflict when attempting to inhibit alcohol-cued compared to non-alcohol cued responses (Fleming & Bartholow, 2014). Non-problem drinkers also appear to show disinhibition towards alcohol-related visual stimuli, responding with significantly more errors and quicker reaction times towards alcohol-related stimuli on the Cued Go/No-Go task (Kreusch et al, 2013) and anti-saccade task (Jones & Field, 2015;King & Byers, 2004;Laude & Fillmore, 2015;McAteer, Curran, & Hanna, 2015). This heightened approach bias towards alcohol-related stimuli is theorised to reflect the salience of such cues to individuals who consume alcohol (Grant & Macdonald, 2005;Rose & Duka, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%