2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2019.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Akaike information criterion should not be a “test” of geographical prediction accuracy in ecological niche modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
46
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, to obtain the most accurate representation of Leptospira circulation in the landscape, it would be necessary to assess the presence of Leptospira serovars in wildlife and the environment to provide and integrative estimation of the geographic and environmental risk (Albert, Goarant, & Mathieu, ). The second limitation that we found was related to the method used for the estimation of the ENM performance, since a recent paper (Velasco & González‐Salazar, ) highlighted the need to reduce the use of AIC for geographic predictions in ecological niche modelling studies due to the lack of accuracy of this approach on evaluating model performance, which is currently one of the most used methods to estimate ENM complexity (Cobos, Peterson, Barve, & Osorio‐Olvera, ; Escobar, Qiao, Cabello, & Peterson, ; Freeman, Sunnarborg, & Peterson, ; Raghavan, Peterson, Cobos, Ganta, & Foley, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, to obtain the most accurate representation of Leptospira circulation in the landscape, it would be necessary to assess the presence of Leptospira serovars in wildlife and the environment to provide and integrative estimation of the geographic and environmental risk (Albert, Goarant, & Mathieu, ). The second limitation that we found was related to the method used for the estimation of the ENM performance, since a recent paper (Velasco & González‐Salazar, ) highlighted the need to reduce the use of AIC for geographic predictions in ecological niche modelling studies due to the lack of accuracy of this approach on evaluating model performance, which is currently one of the most used methods to estimate ENM complexity (Cobos, Peterson, Barve, & Osorio‐Olvera, ; Escobar, Qiao, Cabello, & Peterson, ; Freeman, Sunnarborg, & Peterson, ; Raghavan, Peterson, Cobos, Ganta, & Foley, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the package ENMeval in R v. 3.6.1 [50] to optimize the MaxEnt model, set the regulatory multiplier (RM) to 0.5-8, and each interval was 0.5, for a total of 16 regulatory multipliers [48,51]. We used 9 feature combinations (FCs): L, LQ, H, LQH, LQHP, LQHPT, QHP, QHPT, and HPT(The MaxEnt model provides 5 features, which are linear features (L), quadratic features (Q), segmented features (H), product features (P), and Threshold features (T)) [52,53]. The ENMeval data package was used to test the above 144 parameter combinations, and we finally used the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) model of the Akaike information criterion, and used 10% training omission rate (OR 10 ) and the difference between the AUC values (AUC DIFF ) to check the fit and complexity of the model (Table S2) [50].…”
Section: Model Establishment Optimization and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result suggests that the quality of the model can have an effect on the accuracy of the resulting land-cover classifications, but this effect could largely differ depending on the land-cover under analysis, the threshold used for building the binary maps and the metric used for evaluating the quality of the model [ 16 ]. Therefore, while for some cases the quality of the model has a positive effect on the classification accuracy (e.g., [ 27 ]), in other situations, there may be no relation between them (e.g., [ 28 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%