2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
808
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,428 publications
(894 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
808
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, this can be obtained by concentrating the I/O training observations of the real model in the proximity of the CRs and of their limit surfaces. Sequential adaptive training strategies have been recently developed to this aim (Echard et al, 2011;Picheny et al, 2010). In what follows, the fundamental concepts of Kriging are recalled, with a focus on the adaptive strategy exploited for training the meta-model.…”
Section: Meta-modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In practice, this can be obtained by concentrating the I/O training observations of the real model in the proximity of the CRs and of their limit surfaces. Sequential adaptive training strategies have been recently developed to this aim (Echard et al, 2011;Picheny et al, 2010). In what follows, the fundamental concepts of Kriging are recalled, with a focus on the adaptive strategy exploited for training the meta-model.…”
Section: Meta-modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it is important that the meta-model is capable of discriminating the CR from the normal conditions; thus, instead of using an a-priori fixed DOE, a sequential one (where the experimental observations are iteratively and adaptively added to increase the accuracy of the meta-model around the regions of interest) is preferable. The Adaptive Kriging Monte Carlo Simulation (AK-MCS) (Echard et al, 2011) is here employed to this aim. In the AK-MCS, an initial Kriging model is trained with a small set of I/O observations, e.g., sampled according to LHS scheme; then, the algorithm proceeds iteratively according to the following steps: i) randomly sample a large set of input configurations • = c , … , k 8‚ƒ g, e.g., by means of LHS; ii) evaluate the associated responses using the Kriging metamodel " z = cj … , … , j … k 8‚ƒ g; iii) check if a convergence criterion has been reached: if so, the meta-model is sufficiently accurate; otherwise, iv) select, according to a predefined learning function/criterion, the best candidate subset • * ⊂ • to add to the current DOE and evaluate the corresponding real model output " * ; v) retrain a new Kriging meta-model by adding the • * , " * to the training set and go back to step i).…”
Section: Meta-modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such adaptive techniques have been developed e.g. with Kriging [5][6][7]), SVM [8][9][10][11][12] and polynomial chaos expansions [13,14]. This paper proposes an adaptive technique for assessing low failure probabilities based on SVM surrogates used in regression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to other metamodels, Kriging metamodel is particularly useful for reliability analysis due to the direct availability of error estimation that allows one to deploy active learning strategy [21,22,23] (i.e., Kriging with adaptive sampling). Active learning works by adding more samples so as to increase the accuracy of the metamodel near the region of interest, that is, the limit state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%