2005
DOI: 10.16995/ee.975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aisthesis & An-Aesthesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors have called attention to a broad range of visual engagements that far exceed the gaze that dominates ocularcentric models (Belting 2005; Freedberg 1989; Howes 2003; Morgan 2005; 2007; Marks 2000; Pentcheva 2006; Sobchack 2004; Verrips 2002; 2006). Approaches that appreciate the multi-sensory impact of pictures in constituting a sense of being in the world are particularly relevant with regard to religious pictures, and attitudes toward pictures from a religious perspective.…”
Section: Beyond the Gaze: Pictures As Animated Thingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have called attention to a broad range of visual engagements that far exceed the gaze that dominates ocularcentric models (Belting 2005; Freedberg 1989; Howes 2003; Morgan 2005; 2007; Marks 2000; Pentcheva 2006; Sobchack 2004; Verrips 2002; 2006). Approaches that appreciate the multi-sensory impact of pictures in constituting a sense of being in the world are particularly relevant with regard to religious pictures, and attitudes toward pictures from a religious perspective.…”
Section: Beyond the Gaze: Pictures As Animated Thingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 This has given rise to vibrant, still ongoing debates addressing the pros and cons of technological determinism. 9 Another way to put the visual in perspective, impossible to pursue here, is to pay more attention to other senses than the eye, in particular the ear and questions of hearing (see also Hirschkind, 2001) and touch (see also Marks, 2000;Verrips, 2006). 10 For example, De Vries (2001); Plate (2003); see also Keane (1997), who makes a similar argument in relation to religious language, which faces the dilemma that transcendence supposedly lies outside of discourse, yet requires being reduced to a discursive form so as to be expressed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uma segunda dimensão, relativamente oposta à estética, oferece outra profícua maneira de pensar as infraestruturas, partindo de um conceito mais antigo de Aristóteles, aisthesis (Buck-Morss 1992;Meyer 2009;Verrips 2006). Aisthesis não se refere à apreciação mental de uma obra de arte, mas à reação do corpo à realidade vivida: "É uma forma de cognição, alcançada por meio do paladar, do tato, da escuta, da visão e do olfato" argumenta Buck-Morss (1992:6).…”
Section: Materialidade Infraestrutural E a Produção Da Experiência Do Ambienteunclassified