2023
DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000001123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airway pressure release ventilation for lung protection in acute respiratory distress syndrome: an alternative way to recruit the lungs

Luigi Camporota,
Louise Rose,
Penny L. Andrews
et al.

Abstract: Purpose of review Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is a modality of ventilation in which high inspiratory continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) alternates with brief releases. In this review, we will discuss the rationale for APRV as a lung protective strategy and then provide a practical introduction to initiating APRV using the time-controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV) method. Recent findings APRV using the TCAV method uses an extende… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…at the two pressure levels) [9,10]. PC-SV uses the same working principles as APRV (two pressure levels, no synchronisation) but is adjusted with conventional insu ation time and respiratory rate (contrary to classical APRV set with very short expiratory time) [11] . The difference with classical pressure-assist control is that patients' efforts cannot trigger assisted breaths.…”
Section: Pc-sv Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at the two pressure levels) [9,10]. PC-SV uses the same working principles as APRV (two pressure levels, no synchronisation) but is adjusted with conventional insu ation time and respiratory rate (contrary to classical APRV set with very short expiratory time) [11] . The difference with classical pressure-assist control is that patients' efforts cannot trigger assisted breaths.…”
Section: Pc-sv Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose to categorize ventilator settings into groups based on how each setting impacts lung physiology and their alignment with the preponderance of the basic science literature that has been shown to be lung-protective [10,15]. Specifically, we compared P high set by plateau pressure vs. P high not set by plateau pressure, P low set to 0 vs. P low not set to 0, T low set to 50-75% of peak expiratory flow rate vs. T low not set to 50-75% of peak expiratory flow rate, and T high set based on PaCO 2 vs. T high set arbitrarily.…”
Section: Study Inclusion Criteria and Outcomes Measuredmentioning
confidence: 99%