2015
DOI: 10.4103/0976-237x.161856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airway in Class I and Class II skeletal pattern: A computed tomography study

Abstract: Background and Objectives:A normal airway is required for the normal growth of the craniofacial structures. The present study was designed to evaluate and compare the airway in Class I and Class II skeletal pattern and to see if there is any association between the airway and maxillomandibular relationship.Materials and Methods:Peripheral nervous system computed tomography scans of 30 patients were divided into two groups as Class I (ANB ≤ 4.5°), Class II (ANB ≥ 4.5°). The Dolphin three-dimensional version 11 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Paul et al [20] suggested that there was a strong relationship between the airway and skeletal classes showing a less airway in class II patients with high ANB, while in this study the results showed that there were no significant differences between median total volumes, minimum area, lateral, as well AP dimensions of airway between different skeletal classes.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Osa According To Stop-bang Questionnaire (Tablescontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Paul et al [20] suggested that there was a strong relationship between the airway and skeletal classes showing a less airway in class II patients with high ANB, while in this study the results showed that there were no significant differences between median total volumes, minimum area, lateral, as well AP dimensions of airway between different skeletal classes.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Osa According To Stop-bang Questionnaire (Tablescontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Gender was included in the matching covariates as it has been demonstrated that there are structural and functional differences in upper airway between men and women [ 23 ]. The sagittal skeletal pattern was also used due to the strong relationship between the anteroposterior skeletal pattern and airway volume and MCA [ 24 ]. Tongue posture before orthodontic treatment, which might affect upper airway morphology and dimensions, was also used as a covariate [ 25 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previously mentioned authors have included the epiglottis in the volumetric assessment and delimited the oropharynx up to the second cervical vertebra, in addition to evaluating patients younger than 18 years old. Also, Paul et al 19 region. It is important to highlight that the hypopharynx region was not evaluated in the present research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%