Airflow and Particle Transport Prediction through Stenosis Airways

Abstract

Airflow and particle transport in the human lung system is influenced by biological and other factors such as breathing pattern, particle properties, and deposition mechanisms. Most of the studies to date have analyzed airflow characterization and aerosol transport in idealized and realistic models. Precise airflow characterization for airway stenosis in a digital reference model is lacking in the literature. This study presents a numerical simulation of airflow and particle transport through a stenosis section of the airway. A realistic CT-scan-based mouth-throat and upper airway model was used for the numerical calculations. Three different models of a healthy lung and of airway stenosis of the left and right lung were used for the calculations. The ANSYS FLUENT solver, based on the finite volume discretization technique, was used as a numerical tool. Proper grid refinement and validation were performed. The numerical results show a complex-velocity flow field for airway stenosis, where airflow velocity magnitude at the stenosis section was found to be higher than that in healthy airways. Pressure drops at the mouth-throat and in the upper airways show a nonlinear trend. Comprehensive pressure analysis of stenosis airways would increase our knowledge of the safe mechanical ventilation of the lung. The turbulence intensities at the stenosis sections of the right and left lung were found to be different. Deposition efficiency (DE) increased with flow rate and particle size. The findings of the present study increase our understanding of airflow patterns in airway stenosis under various disease conditions. More comprehensive stenosis analysis is required to further improve knowledge of the field.

Computational Analysis of Airflow in Upper Airway under Light and Heavy Breathing Conditions for a Realistic Patient Having Obstructive Sleep Apnea

“…The simulation results noticed that the maximum velocity occurred at 0.03 m (occur at the minimum cross section area) from the inlet. This phenomenon was also observed by Singh et al [34], whereas the velocity and turbulence intensity slightly elevated at the stenosis area. The velocity contour of both light and heavy breathing showed the highly similar pattern as shown in Plane 3 (Tab.…”

Testing of Commercial Masks and Respirators and Cotton Mask Insert Materials using SARS-CoV-2 Virion-Sized Particulates: Comparison of Ideal Aerosol Filtration Efficiency versus Fitted Filtration Efficiency

“…To date, these studies generally measure filtration efficiency of a base filter media in an ideal-fit scenario, where materials are challenged within a sealed container and leakage is not considered. Proper fit is important, and air permeability of the filter material plays a role in where particles may travel in a loosely fitting mask, especially where smaller particulates are concerned which may more easily follow air vectors , around an imperfect fit.…”

Aerosol Particle Transport and Deposition in Upper and Lower Airways of Infant, Child and Adult Human Lungs

“…Table 2 lists the flow parameters used in this study. The velocity inlet and pressure outlet boundary conditions are considered at the lung model's inlet and outlet, respectively [29][30][31][32][33]. The airway wall was considered to be stationary, and a non-slip boundary condition is used on the wall surface [34][35][36].…”