2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airborne laser scanning-based prediction of coarse woody debris volumes in a conservation area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
93
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The European CORINE Land Cover (CLC2000) database in a 25 m grid can help in coarse assessments of some biophysical characteristics of the environment (Vihervaara et al 2010), but it cannot provide accurate information on local species assemblages and biotope types that form the basis of ecosystem service supply. More detailed tools, such as airborne laser scanning (ALS), are needed (Hill and Thomson 2005;Pesonen et al 2008;Vehmas et al 2009;Asner et al 2012;Vihervaara et al 2012;Pippuri et al 2012Pippuri et al , 2013. ALS has revolutionized the ways to measure forest structure in 3D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The European CORINE Land Cover (CLC2000) database in a 25 m grid can help in coarse assessments of some biophysical characteristics of the environment (Vihervaara et al 2010), but it cannot provide accurate information on local species assemblages and biotope types that form the basis of ecosystem service supply. More detailed tools, such as airborne laser scanning (ALS), are needed (Hill and Thomson 2005;Pesonen et al 2008;Vehmas et al 2009;Asner et al 2012;Vihervaara et al 2012;Pippuri et al 2012Pippuri et al , 2013. ALS has revolutionized the ways to measure forest structure in 3D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ALS data have been related to animal habitat data, this far mostly for birds (e.g., Hill et al, 2004;Hinsley et al, 2008;Lesak et al, 2011), but also for forest-dwelling beetles (Müller and Brandl, 2009). The amount of lying dead wood (Pesonen et al, 2008) and standing dead wood (Bater et al, 2009) in forests has been estimated from ALS data with area-based approaches (i.e., based on the correlation between the total amount of dead wood and measures derived from the ALS data in 900 to 1600 m 2 raster cells). The analyses above have not utilized the detailed 3D structure of ALS data, which may be done with, for example, object based image analysis (Blanchard et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the differentiation between deciduous and coniferous trees can be performed with a high accuracy (>80%, up to~97%) the differentiation within these classes is more difficult and leads to a higher classification error [111]. Moreover, it is possible to distinguish between living trees, standing dead trees and snags [112][113][114] or to map dead trees on the plot or stand level [115,116]. However, 3D LiDAR has its limitations for differentiating between trees species and dead trees unless it is not combined with multi-and hyperspectral optical data.…”
Section: Light Detection and Ranging (Lidar)mentioning
confidence: 99%