2019
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab3bae
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air quality and health benefits of China’s emission control policies on coal-fired power plants during 2005–2020

Abstract: Coal-fired power plants (CPPs) dominate China's energy supply systems. Over the past two decades, the explosive growth of CPPs has led to negative air quality and health impacts in China, and a series of control policies have been implemented to alleviate those impacts. In this work, by combining a CPPs emission database over China (CPED), a regional chemical transport model (WRF-CMAQ), and the integrated exposure-response model, we summarized historical and ongoing emission control policies on CPPs over China… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(55 reference statements)
5
72
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While as typical heavy industrial cities, it is impossible for SJZ, Xingtai, Handan, and Anyang to remove their industrial factories. Actually, the above four industrial cities implement the critical ultralow emission standards since 2017 in coal fire power plants, steel, and coking factories (Wu et al, 2019), which led to significant decline of the concentrations of SO 2 . However, the SO 2 emission is inevitable and the ratio of the highest to the lowest monthly concentration are still higher than Beijing, indicating the implementation of policies among different cities, as well as industrial conformation, energy structure and meteorological conditions, affect the concentrations of pollutants (Ma et al, 2015; Zhao & Luo, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While as typical heavy industrial cities, it is impossible for SJZ, Xingtai, Handan, and Anyang to remove their industrial factories. Actually, the above four industrial cities implement the critical ultralow emission standards since 2017 in coal fire power plants, steel, and coking factories (Wu et al, 2019), which led to significant decline of the concentrations of SO 2 . However, the SO 2 emission is inevitable and the ratio of the highest to the lowest monthly concentration are still higher than Beijing, indicating the implementation of policies among different cities, as well as industrial conformation, energy structure and meteorological conditions, affect the concentrations of pollutants (Ma et al, 2015; Zhao & Luo, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accompanying with large amounts of fossil energy combustion, China’s thermal power plants have become major sources of air pollutants, emitting 5.0–23.5%, 15.7–38.7% and 19.1–51.5% of China’s anthropogenic particulate matter (PM, defined as microscopic solid or liquid matter suspended in the atmosphere) 3 – 6 , SO 2 4 10 and NO X 4 11 , respectively, from 2010 to 2017. These air pollutants (representing 5.9%, 23.1% and 21.5% of China’s anthropogenic PM, SO 2 and NO X emissions, respectively, in 2015 5 ), through a series of physical processes and chemical reactions in the atmosphere 12 , contributed to 7.6% of China’s population-weighted PM 2.5 (PM with an aerodynamic diameter of or below 2.5 μm) concentration as of 2015 13 , 14 , leading to severe haze events and human health damage nationwide.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for each power plant. The CEAP dataset has already been employed to conduct an ex post analysis on the efficacy of the ULE policy in mitigating China’s power emissions 24 and will facilitate further research on the environmental improvements and health benefits associated with the mitigation effect 14 , 24 , 25 , serve policymakers to design future clean air policies 14 , and provide implications for other countries seeking to understand and regulate their power emissions.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SO 2 and CO emissions were mainly from boilers, accounting for 49 % and 73 % of the total emissions, respectively. Notably, emission contributions from power plants were significantly lower than those from previous inventories (MEIC, http://meicmodel.org/, last access: 15 January 2020; Zhou et al, 2017), resulting mainly from the implementation of stringent emission reduction measures in recent years (Wu et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Estimation Of O 3 and Soa Formation Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 86%