2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air pollution exposure during pregnancy and ultrasound and birth measures of fetal growth: A prospective cohort study in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the lack of a standardized definition of FGR, we cannot draw a direct correlation between prenatal PM 2.5 exposure and FGR, but AC, FL and BPD are important indicators for EFW, which can indirectly reflect the association between prenatal PM 2.5 exposure and FGR. Consistent with previous similar studies [6, 8, 11, 12, 25, 26], our study showed that atmospheric PM 2.5 exposure during pregnancy negatively affected all measures of fetal growth. However, the effect coefficients were much higher than those in previous studies, which may be due to the higher atmospheric PM 2.5 concentration in China.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Due to the lack of a standardized definition of FGR, we cannot draw a direct correlation between prenatal PM 2.5 exposure and FGR, but AC, FL and BPD are important indicators for EFW, which can indirectly reflect the association between prenatal PM 2.5 exposure and FGR. Consistent with previous similar studies [6, 8, 11, 12, 25, 26], our study showed that atmospheric PM 2.5 exposure during pregnancy negatively affected all measures of fetal growth. However, the effect coefficients were much higher than those in previous studies, which may be due to the higher atmospheric PM 2.5 concentration in China.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The negative effect of PM on weight at birth is instead coherent with current literature [ 43 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Numerous studies have confirmed that maternal exposure to air pollution is positively associated with the risk of maternal diseases (Robledo et al 2015) (Nachman et al 2016;Pedersen et al 2014) and fetal diseases such as PTB, SGA, LBW, and birth defects (Geer et al 2012;Girguis et al 2016;Gray et al 2014;Lamichhane et al 2018). These diseases may share the same mechanism or pathogenesis with CH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We cannot rule out the potential impacts of maternal exposure to the other air pollutants on the occurrence of newborn CH because of the failure to observe the associations in the present study. Previous studies identified that maternal exposure to SO 2 and CO has a certain impact on adverse birth outcomes (Lamichhane et al 2018 ; Robledo et al 2015 ). Perhaps the effects will be found through the expansion of sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%