“…The oral (ingestion) pathway, considered the critical exposure route when modelling public open space, residential, and commercial settings (DEFRA, 2014a), has been the focus of much research to assess the human risk assessment from exposure to environmental contaminants predominantly via hand-to-mouth (deliberate) or unintentional ingestion of soils and related materials (Boisa et al, 2013;Cai et al, 2016;Intawongse and Dean, 2006;Li et al, 2014;Lorenzi et al, 2012;Okorie et al, 2012;Oomen et al, 2002;Smith et al, 2011;Wragg et al, 2009;Wragg et al, 2011). However, given the increasing acknowledgement of the association of PM concentrations (the chemical composition, as well as the physical presence) with both short-term and long-term health consequences (Kelly and Fussell, 2015), and the recognition that it is the soluble fraction rather than the total element content that has more direct links to health effects (Adamson et al, 2000;Ghio and Devlin, 2001;Heal et al, 2005), the inhalation exposure pathway was the focus of this current study. Indeed, in many urban and high dust generating contexts it is now timely, given increasing evidence of the link between PM10s and a range of human disease pathologies (Kelly and Fussell, 2012;Kelly and Fussell, 2015;Uzu et al, 2011), to consider the potential inhalation burden and bioaccessibility of PHEs in airborne PM and other environmental samples with a particle size fraction b10 μm.…”