1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(90)90094-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air permeability measurements of the unsaturated Bandelier Tuff near Los Alamos, New Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean K sat values from both wells (Table 1) are lower than K sat estimates of the same Tshirege member of Bandelier Tuff from the nearby Los Alamos National Laboratory that range from 7.6 × 10 −2 to 1.12 m d −1 (Rogers and Gallaher, 1995;Smyth and Sharp, 2006) and 9.3 × 10 −1 to 1.6 × 10 1 m d −1 (Kearl et al, 1990;Smyth and Sharp, 2006). This may be, in part, because slug tests provide localized estimates of the hydraulic conductivity directly surrounding the screened interval of the well in contrast to pumping tests that Table 3.…”
Section: Hydrologic Responsementioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mean K sat values from both wells (Table 1) are lower than K sat estimates of the same Tshirege member of Bandelier Tuff from the nearby Los Alamos National Laboratory that range from 7.6 × 10 −2 to 1.12 m d −1 (Rogers and Gallaher, 1995;Smyth and Sharp, 2006) and 9.3 × 10 −1 to 1.6 × 10 1 m d −1 (Kearl et al, 1990;Smyth and Sharp, 2006). This may be, in part, because slug tests provide localized estimates of the hydraulic conductivity directly surrounding the screened interval of the well in contrast to pumping tests that Table 3.…”
Section: Hydrologic Responsementioning
confidence: 74%
“…The influence of the hydrogeologic environment (i.e., geology, topography, and climate) on the groundwater flow system of a given geographic region has long been accepted as the theoretical framework used to conceptualize groundwater flow. Building on the conceptual model of Toth (1970) and the understanding that one part of the framework informs our knowledge of the other, several studies have focused on topography (Beven and Kirkby, 1979;Woods et al, 1997;Hutchinson and Moore, 2000;Kirchner et al, 2001;McGuire et al, 2005) and rock type (Farvolden, 1963;Freeze, 1972;Kelson and Wells, 1989;Mwakalila et al, 2002) as controls of groundwater flow systems. However, subsurface heterogeneities, which can be abundant and are challenging to identify, can give rise to complex, localized groundwater stores, whose contribution to streamflow can be very difficult to discern.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other solutions for steady-state analysis of air-permeability tests, such as solutions presented by Kearl et al [1990] and Rasmussen et al [1990], yield similar results. Differences in the assumed flow geometry are responsible for small variations in estimated permeability values using the various analytical solutions.…”
Section: Steady-state Flow Analysismentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Pneumatic injection tests were often conducted in boreholes to estimate air permeability on scales ranging from 1 to 20 m [ LeCain , ; Bossart et al ., ; Illman , ]. For single as well as cross‐holes tests, the methods that are used to estimate permeability are the following: steady‐state analyses [ Kearl et al ., ; Baehr and Hult , ; Jakubick and Franz , ; Guzman et al ., ; LeCain , ; Bossart et al ., ; Illman and Neuman , ], type curve analyses [ Illman and Neuman , ; Illman , ], 3‐D numerical inversions with homogeneous or heterogeneous models [ Vesselinov et al ., ; Vesselinov and Neuman , ; Zhou et al ., ; Ni and Yeh , ], and asymptotic analyses [ Illman and Tartakovsky , ]. Here pneumatic injection tests are conducted in single holes in three settings, having different locations, sizes and geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%