2000
DOI: 10.1080/778879052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air Movement Visualization in the Workplace: Current Methods and New Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many natural human activities also have the potential to disseminate infectious aerosols, such as breathing, talking, coughing, sneezing and even singing, which may be a particularly effective means of transmitting airborne infection (Cole & Cook 1998;Edwards et al 2004;. More recently, there have been several inter-disciplinary reviews involving both microbiologists and engineers (Tang et al 2006;Li et al 2007), as well as cross-disciplinary studies involving both physicians and engineers examining the risks of airborne transmission from droplet dispersion and using airflow visualization in different clinical scenarios, including some simulated environments (Qian et al 2006;Xie et al 2006Xie et al , 2007 and others involving 'real-life' operating theatres and the workplace (Kim & Flynn 1991;Maynard et al 2000;Pan et al 2003;Brohus et al 2006).…”
Section: Airborne Infection In Hospitalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many natural human activities also have the potential to disseminate infectious aerosols, such as breathing, talking, coughing, sneezing and even singing, which may be a particularly effective means of transmitting airborne infection (Cole & Cook 1998;Edwards et al 2004;. More recently, there have been several inter-disciplinary reviews involving both microbiologists and engineers (Tang et al 2006;Li et al 2007), as well as cross-disciplinary studies involving both physicians and engineers examining the risks of airborne transmission from droplet dispersion and using airflow visualization in different clinical scenarios, including some simulated environments (Qian et al 2006;Xie et al 2006Xie et al , 2007 and others involving 'real-life' operating theatres and the workplace (Kim & Flynn 1991;Maynard et al 2000;Pan et al 2003;Brohus et al 2006).…”
Section: Airborne Infection In Hospitalsmentioning
confidence: 99%